2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/Pascal's wager

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Pascal's wager | Result: No consensus[edit]

Pascal's wager (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Proposal[edit]

  1. The article was already very good in content, and now that I've dealt with the raw and dead links and made some other minor changes, I think it's worth a Silver Brainstar. TheOneAndOnlyCirrusMan (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Status quo[edit]

  1. There are large sections of text without any citation. Bongolian (talk) 06:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Goat[edit]