RationalWiki:RFA

Note: This page is a joke. We're not wikipedia, we don't do this stuff. We wouldn't even know how if we tried.

Further note for those who don't even know what this is. Presumably at Wikipedia it is necessary for Admins to go through some sort of vetting process. At a guess "RFA" stands for "Request For Administration powers" (or possibly Right Fucking Arsehole).

Nomination

Aswh1 (talk · contribs · block  · rights  · rename)  – Aswh1 (talk) 19:12, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

Uh, this isn't Wikipedia. -- Nx / talk 04:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. If you have to ask to be a sysop on RationalWiki, you're doing it wrong. Blue (is useful) 04:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: Helping to remove non-encyclopaedic content and confirming Wikipedia a universally trusted institution.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My articles on various subjects relating to Politics and Dogs because they are informative and useful.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: Once. Due to a slight misunderstanding on my part. Other users have nominated by articles for deletion for trivial reasons but I stated my case and the settlement was easily resolved.

General comments

• Links for Aswh1: {{usercheck-short|Aswh1}}
• Edit summary usage for 07bargem can be found ----

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review eir contributions before commenting.

• Are they known as a goat fucker? ħuman 05:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

Oppose

1. Asking to be sysop. -- Nx / talk 04:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
2. Ditto, RuNxsh. ħuman 05:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
3. ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn Pinto's5150 ^Talk 05:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Goat

1. Blue (is useful)
2. What the screaming banshees of New Gwenson is this RFA let's-be-like-Wikipedia doing here? Someone sysop him if he's obviously ok, otherwise leave him to prove himself for another twenty minutes few days if he's not, but let's not have this bureaucratic nonsense. Totnesmartin (talk) 10:34, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
3. Likewise. 10:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Flobbalob

1. 

Does that make you Little Weed? --PsyGremlinKhuluma! 10:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Well, I ain't Bill & I ain't Ben. 10:53, 18 October 2010 (UTC)