There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki talk:Do we keep these CP-related articles?/Resolved
Do you want help then? Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 06:55, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- The other problem is whether you include those articles deleted without discussion. Peter tanquam ex ungue leonem 07:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, absolutely! larronsicut fur in nocte 07:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Just FYI A. I accept 0 responsibility for any of his, especially the parts where I'm a dick, and B. please don't scatter this so far and wide so that someone like me who only looks at the site a few times a day if that will be lost... I see that already happening. Plus, as usual, get fucked you officious cunts. Cuddles
07:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Just FYI A. I accept 0 responsibility for any of his, especially the parts where I'm a dick, and B. please don't scatter this so far and wide so that someone like me who only looks at the site a few times a day if that will be lost... I see that already happening. Plus, as usual, get fucked you officious cunts. Cuddles
- Oh, absolutely! larronsicut fur in nocte 07:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Is this for just deletes, or the keeps too? Turpis 3:16 (talk) 14:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Um, if you want to have people vote on things, you should leave them not deleted until people vote on them, as it's a hassle for people to actually look at them, Messrs. Tiggerfingers. steriletalk 16:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
End point[edit]
So, is there an end to this whole process? Although I expressed caution at the beginning, now it just seems to be getting old. sterileevolutionist story telling 14:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)