RationalWiki talk:Do we keep these CP-related articles?/Resolved

Do you want help then? Peter ^{tanquam ex ungue leonem} 06:55, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

The other problem is whether you include those articles deleted without discussion. Peter ^{tanquam ex ungue leonem} 07:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh, absolutely! larron^{sicut fur in nocte} 07:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Just FYI A. I accept 0 responsibility for any of his, especially the parts where I'm a dick, and B. please don't scatter this so far and wide so that someone like me who only looks at the site a few times a day if that will be lost... I see that already happening. Plus, as usual, get fucked you officious cunts. Cuddles 07:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't see why somebody would say something like that. --★uːʤɱ soviet 14:55, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Is this for just deletes, or the keeps too? Turpis 3:16 (talk) 14:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Um, if you want to have people vote on things, you should leave them not deleted until people vote on them, as it's a hassle for people to actually look at them, Messrs. Tiggerfingers. sterile^talk 16:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Linking to the "Special:Undelete" doesn't work: There may be people can't read it, and for the rest of us, it's fucking annoying and makes me pissed off enough to vote for keep for all of these. sterile^talk 16:30, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I get it these are the "Decided" ones. You might want to put a paragraph at the top of the page to make it less confusing. sterile^talk 16:34, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

End point

So, is there an end to this whole process? Although I expressed caution at the beginning, now it just seems to be getting old. sterile^{evolutionist story telling} 14:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)