2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

RationalWiki talk:Policy poll

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
You know, Famas, this isn't a completely terrible idea. However, IMO formatting it like RW:TODO is a bad idea. Each "article proposal" on RW:TODO is an individual proposal that can rise or fall on its own. It'd be more useful to have multiple-option polls like RationalWiki:To do list/Pointless polls. What do you think? FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 17:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
in reply to FuzzyCatPotato, this user asserts the fact that multi option polls do not work for cases of policy enactment in that most policy enactment polls are of "make rationalwiki invulnerable fortress of knowledge with users armed to max against the universe of ignorance" want-## do not want-##— Unsigned, by: FAMAS / talk / contribs