|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 16:54, 29 April 2014 diff hist +835 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: Lisle's ASC-based universe requires that God created the star that became SN1987A as a 12 million year old star just 6,000 years ago
- 11:04, 29 April 2014 diff hist +112 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: (yes, it would take an incredible telescope to even ''see'' the earth from that far away, but, again, humor me)
- 09:30, 29 April 2014 diff hist +76 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: as just one example: stars in very distant galaxies have no heavy elements
- 09:26, 29 April 2014 diff hist +34 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: (from Earth's frame of reference)
- 05:26, 29 April 2014 diff hist -295 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Clarify: This is the isotropic way of seeing the anisotropic universe proposed by Lisle
- 03:43, 29 April 2014 diff hist 0 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: gravity -> inertia (it's a mega inertial damper)
- 03:39, 29 April 2014 diff hist +78 m Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: ~~~~
- 03:38, 29 April 2014 diff hist +395 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: http://scitechdaily.com/rapid-star-formation-observed-in-the-phoenix-cluster/
- 03:28, 29 April 2014 diff hist +1,623 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: If we're seeing the LMC of right now, it will take us 336,000 years to get there.
- 23:03, 28 April 2014 diff hist +666 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Lisle is just giving us a Omphalos hypothesis universe
- 22:47, 28 April 2014 diff hist +372 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: The ASC creates the same observed universe. "at once" 6,000 years ago
- 22:37, 28 April 2014 diff hist +1 m Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: other -> others
- 22:37, 28 April 2014 diff hist +2,587 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: new section
- 22:02, 28 April 2014 diff hist +355 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Yes and no. ASC is screwy and unintuitive.
- 21:33, 28 April 2014 diff hist +30 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →ASC and SN1987A: Clarify that Dr. Lisle is proposing absolute time
- 21:31, 28 April 2014 diff hist +738 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →ASC and SN1987A: I don't blame Cat Watcher for thinking there is an absolute time frame because, well, Dr. Lisle thinks there is one.
- 21:08, 28 April 2014 diff hist +72 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: "at once", of course, doesn't exist in special relativity
- 21:06, 28 April 2014 diff hist +2 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Grant -> User:GrantC
- 21:05, 28 April 2014 diff hist +1,004 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Expand and correct Andromeda distance
- 20:54, 28 April 2014 diff hist +1,726 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Clarifying that the ASC doesn't change anything we actually observe
- 23:43, 7 August 2013 diff hist -84 User:Samiam fix broken link current
- 20:08, 7 August 2013 diff hist +587 User:Samiam http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unfundamentalistchristians/2013/07/what-non-christians-want-christians-to-hear/
- 21:30, 6 July 2013 diff hist -310 Starlight problem →Anisotropic synchrony convention: Shorter, better refutation of Anisotropic synchrony convention
- 07:51, 6 July 2013 diff hist 0 m User:Samiam old <-> young
- 21:39, 5 July 2013 diff hist +437 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Let me back up some of my refutation with solid math: While it takes longer than 2,071 years for the light to reach Earth, he and I both agree it takes under 10,000 years.
- 06:12, 5 July 2013 diff hist -28 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: It won’t be a sphere of darkness, but the darkness will still be geocentric
- 20:12, 4 July 2013 diff hist +71 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: The “sphere of darkness” is opaque, since any star directly behind Earth will become visible in the mirror at the same time Earth does
- 19:28, 4 July 2013 diff hist +2 m User talk:Samiam →What I told Dr. Jason Lisle: -ly current
- 18:21, 4 July 2013 diff hist +77 User talk:Samiam →What I told Dr. Jason Lisle: ~~~~
- 18:20, 4 July 2013 diff hist +2,318 User talk:Samiam My comment on Dr. Lisle’s blog
- 18:15, 4 July 2013 diff hist +1,478 User:Samiam OK, so far I’m an anti-Anisotropic synchrony convention SPA. Thank you for your help Martin Arrowsmith!
- 13:02, 4 July 2013 diff hist +142 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Indeed, distant stars would appear in this mirror before our own sun would in the ASC universe. <!-- As shown with math on the talk page -->
- 12:59, 4 July 2013 diff hist -22 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: While my intuition says the sphere of darkness contracts at c, I’m not going to bother calculating its actual contraction rate, so I’m removing this tidbit
- 12:03, 4 July 2013 diff hist +316 Anisotropic synchrony convention Adding hidden comment asking people to review my math before reverting this bit of original research
- 11:54, 4 July 2013 diff hist +682 User talk:Martin Arrowsmith →Does this thought experiment hold water: OK, I did the math myself
- 11:44, 4 July 2013 diff hist +1 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Let me back up some of my refutation with solid map: Solid math, guys. Solid math.
- 11:43, 4 July 2013 diff hist +711 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Let me back up some of my refutation with solid map: Some more clarification with the 2-star one mirror Lisle ASC universe
- 11:35, 4 July 2013 diff hist +5,462 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Why I want to archive the old discussion: OK, I backed up the contracting sphere of darkness observed in a mirror via solid math
- 10:19, 4 July 2013 diff hist +95 Anisotropic synchrony convention Undo revision 1209711 by Samiam (talk) Never mind, the mirror works.
- 10:14, 4 July 2013 diff hist -95 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Opps! The mirror x/2 light years away from Earth isn't actually equivalent to a distant observer x light years away.
- 08:10, 4 July 2013 diff hist +149 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Clarify wording about sphere of darkness
- 07:56, 4 July 2013 diff hist +9 m Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Another smart quote
- 07:41, 4 July 2013 diff hist -2 m Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: As per Wikipedia’s manual of style, no smart quotes in article space (to make searches work better)
- 07:28, 4 July 2013 diff hist +727 User talk:Spud →Why I want to archive the old discussion: I want legitimate disagreement backed up by science.
- 07:23, 4 July 2013 diff hist 0 m Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: G → g
- 07:18, 4 July 2013 diff hist +33 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Observational evidence: Rename section “Problems with Lisle's paper”
- 07:17, 4 July 2013 diff hist +2,049 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Obfuscating the Omphalos hypothesis: Actually, the only Omphalos-like artifact Lisle doesn’t like is artificial light in transit
- 07:05, 4 July 2013 diff hist +3,362 User talk:Spud Why I tried to archive it
- 07:02, 4 July 2013 diff hist +3,182 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention Why I tried to archive it
- 06:33, 4 July 2013 diff hist 0 m Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention |