There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 16:54, 29 April 2014 diff hist +835 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: Lisle's ASC-based universe requires that God created the star that became SN1987A as a 12 million year old star just 6,000 years ago
- 11:04, 29 April 2014 diff hist +112 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: (yes, it would take an incredible telescope to even ''see'' the earth from that far away, but, again, humor me)
- 09:30, 29 April 2014 diff hist +76 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: as just one example: stars in very distant galaxies have no heavy elements
- 09:26, 29 April 2014 diff hist +34 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: (from Earth's frame of reference)
- 05:26, 29 April 2014 diff hist -295 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Clarify: This is the isotropic way of seeing the anisotropic universe proposed by Lisle
- 03:43, 29 April 2014 diff hist 0 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: gravity -> inertia (it's a mega inertial damper)
- 03:39, 29 April 2014 diff hist +78 m Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: ~~~~
- 03:38, 29 April 2014 diff hist +395 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: http://scitechdaily.com/rapid-star-formation-observed-in-the-phoenix-cluster/
- 03:28, 29 April 2014 diff hist +1,623 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: If we're seeing the LMC of right now, it will take us 336,000 years to get there.
- 23:03, 28 April 2014 diff hist +666 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Lisle is just giving us a Omphalos hypothesis universe
- 22:47, 28 April 2014 diff hist +372 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: The ASC creates the same observed universe. "at once" 6,000 years ago
- 22:37, 28 April 2014 diff hist +1 m Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: other -> others
- 22:37, 28 April 2014 diff hist +2,587 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →My vacation in the Large Magellanic Cloud: new section
- 22:02, 28 April 2014 diff hist +355 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Yes and no. ASC is screwy and unintuitive.
- 21:33, 28 April 2014 diff hist +30 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →ASC and SN1987A: Clarify that Dr. Lisle is proposing absolute time
- 21:31, 28 April 2014 diff hist +738 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →ASC and SN1987A: I don't blame Cat Watcher for thinking there is an absolute time frame because, well, Dr. Lisle thinks there is one.
- 21:08, 28 April 2014 diff hist +72 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: "at once", of course, doesn't exist in special relativity
- 21:06, 28 April 2014 diff hist +2 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Grant -> User:GrantC
- 21:05, 28 April 2014 diff hist +1,004 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Expand and correct Andromeda distance
- 20:54, 28 April 2014 diff hist +1,726 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Geocentric Universe: Clarifying that the ASC doesn't change anything we actually observe
- 23:43, 7 August 2013 diff hist -84 User:Samiam fix broken link current
- 20:08, 7 August 2013 diff hist +587 User:Samiam http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unfundamentalistchristians/2013/07/what-non-christians-want-christians-to-hear/
- 21:30, 6 July 2013 diff hist -310 Starlight problem →Anisotropic synchrony convention: Shorter, better refutation of Anisotropic synchrony convention
- 07:51, 6 July 2013 diff hist 0 m User:Samiam old <-> young
- 21:39, 5 July 2013 diff hist +437 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Let me back up some of my refutation with solid math: While it takes longer than 2,071 years for the light to reach Earth, he and I both agree it takes under 10,000 years.
- 06:12, 5 July 2013 diff hist -28 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: It won’t be a sphere of darkness, but the darkness will still be geocentric
- 20:12, 4 July 2013 diff hist +71 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: The “sphere of darkness” is opaque, since any star directly behind Earth will become visible in the mirror at the same time Earth does
- 19:28, 4 July 2013 diff hist +2 m User talk:Samiam →What I told Dr. Jason Lisle: -ly current
- 18:21, 4 July 2013 diff hist +77 User talk:Samiam →What I told Dr. Jason Lisle: ~~~~
- 18:20, 4 July 2013 diff hist +2,318 User talk:Samiam My comment on Dr. Lisle’s blog
- 18:15, 4 July 2013 diff hist +1,478 User:Samiam OK, so far I’m an anti-Anisotropic synchrony convention SPA. Thank you for your help Martin Arrowsmith!
- 13:02, 4 July 2013 diff hist +142 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Indeed, distant stars would appear in this mirror before our own sun would in the ASC universe. <!-- As shown with math on the talk page -->
- 12:59, 4 July 2013 diff hist -22 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: While my intuition says the sphere of darkness contracts at c, I’m not going to bother calculating its actual contraction rate, so I’m removing this tidbit
- 12:03, 4 July 2013 diff hist +316 Anisotropic synchrony convention Adding hidden comment asking people to review my math before reverting this bit of original research
- 11:54, 4 July 2013 diff hist +682 User talk:Martin Arrowsmith →Does this thought experiment hold water: OK, I did the math myself
- 11:44, 4 July 2013 diff hist +1 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Let me back up some of my refutation with solid map: Solid math, guys. Solid math.
- 11:43, 4 July 2013 diff hist +711 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Let me back up some of my refutation with solid map: Some more clarification with the 2-star one mirror Lisle ASC universe
- 11:35, 4 July 2013 diff hist +5,462 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention →Why I want to archive the old discussion: OK, I backed up the contracting sphere of darkness observed in a mirror via solid math
- 10:19, 4 July 2013 diff hist +95 Anisotropic synchrony convention Undo revision 1209711 by Samiam (talk) Never mind, the mirror works.
- 10:14, 4 July 2013 diff hist -95 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Opps! The mirror x/2 light years away from Earth isn't actually equivalent to a distant observer x light years away.
- 08:10, 4 July 2013 diff hist +149 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Clarify wording about sphere of darkness
- 07:56, 4 July 2013 diff hist +9 m Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: Another smart quote
- 07:41, 4 July 2013 diff hist -2 m Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: As per Wikipedia’s manual of style, no smart quotes in article space (to make searches work better)
- 07:28, 4 July 2013 diff hist +727 User talk:Spud →Why I want to archive the old discussion: I want legitimate disagreement backed up by science.
- 07:23, 4 July 2013 diff hist 0 m Anisotropic synchrony convention →Problems with Lisle's paper: G → g
- 07:18, 4 July 2013 diff hist +33 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Observational evidence: Rename section “Problems with Lisle's paper”
- 07:17, 4 July 2013 diff hist +2,049 Anisotropic synchrony convention →Obfuscating the Omphalos hypothesis: Actually, the only Omphalos-like artifact Lisle doesn’t like is artificial light in transit
- 07:05, 4 July 2013 diff hist +3,362 User talk:Spud Why I tried to archive it
- 07:02, 4 July 2013 diff hist +3,182 Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention Why I tried to archive it
- 06:33, 4 July 2013 diff hist 0 m Talk:Anisotropic synchrony convention |