Eichmann's comments on the Höss memoirs are annihilating. Reading where Rudolf Höss is saying that two and a half million Jews have been liquidated at Auschwitz, the camp where he was commandant, Eichmann comments, "Where does Höss believe that he got these two and a half million Jews? Not from me. Because to have liquidated two and a half million decrepit, elderly, unworkable Jews, I must have had to feed to him three, four, five, six or seven million Jews in that space of time, and from the transport point of view alone this would have been totally impossible."
"Many readers disagree with the content or tone of our articles.
Good! Open discussion is very important."
LMAO Punch the Wehrmacht (talk) 10:12, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
So just a heads-up, those are the original Eichmann memoirs, not those reported in "Life magazine"
Ban away assholes Punch the Wehrmacht (talk) 10:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, please cite a notorious anti-semite, historical revisionist, and pseudoscientist. This will definitely help your case, not hamstring it. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 10:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- And right on cue we get name-calling against the person who posted the source. Unbelievable irrationality. What are you people, JIDF based in Israel? Why do the others tolerate your shit? 220.127.116.11 (talk) 11:20, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- And cue the insinuations that we're shills for the only predominantly Jewish country on Earth. Gosh golly gee wilikers, it's almost as if the shoe fits not only Irving, but yourself as well Mike. But, it's not as if you are picking and choosing sources that agree with you Ad hoc, in a manner that is both fallicous and dishonest... Nuh uh, you would never resort to such underhanded and unsavory tactics out of desperation. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 11:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Everyone of your articles is cherry picked sources. Whenever anyone produces contradictory material you ban them then complain about underhand tactics. The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 11:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- I note a tacit admission of guilt on your part in your last reply. Could it be that you are a anti-Semitic ideolog who cares naught for truth? Say it is not so!!! would that it were that you aspire to have the intellectual and moral high ground in all things, no matter the (supposed) actions of others!!! ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 11:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- It's much easier to engage in this ad hominem bullshit than go over material that contradicts you isn't it? 22.214.171.124 (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- This from a guy who has made at least three threats against my person. Were it twere not so, but it is indeed so. Besides, the Ad hominem charge is negated if the claim regarding the character of the accused is accurate, i.e. if I called Hitler a megalomaniacal despot with delusions of grandeur, it would in fact not be an insult but a statement of fact. Thus, the charge of ad hominem is negated. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 13:48, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, and I see you're already trying to veer off topic with anti-semtic dog whistles. How quaint. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 13:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- It would be ad hominem if you used that opinion to dismiss a message he reported, especially if he had no record of misreporting messages, and if in fact you could view the message yourself. But then you know this, and you're a bullshitting sophistry wielding piece of shit. In fact you're sliding away from looking at that Eichmann papers right now with this hypocritical and irrelevant lecture. You don't want anyone looking at the Eichmann papers do you so you start a little fight then ban your opponent. All the Jews do is engage in ad hominem attacks against the messenger to distract from the truth. There is nothing Jews hate more than the whole truth, since they are a crime family. Shame on you and shame on the other assholes that run this place for enabling you. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Irving's credentials have been gone for a long while now, partly due to his habit of well... Lying. Anywho... There's the little rabid anti-semitism, and all I had to do was call a spade a spade. Oh, one last thing for the record, I'm neither ethnically nor religiously Jewish. And even if I was it wouldn't matter one iota, because opinions form separately of a person's ancestry. A baker's children grow up to be firefighters, a schoolteacher raises a future soldier, a priest's son is secretly in love with the boy next door. Human beings are much more complex and varied than your insignificantly shallow worldview gives them credit for Mike, so much so that you appear to be literally unable to fathom other people's opinions outside of some cartoonish plot. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 14:25, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- So then you act like a Jew. That Eichmann paper is authentic. You're an intellectual fraud. This whole website is an academic fraud. Actually the owner should be prosecuted for criminal fraud for soliciting donations under false pretences. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 14:48, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
- Case in point, the previous comment ignores the latter half of my own previous post, thus failing to acknowledge anything outside of Mike's echo chamber. How quaint, boring and, predictable. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 16:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)