There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Americans for Prosperity
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Being a bit of a commie, I don't like AFP. I don't like them at all. In fact, I revile them. But holy shit this article is POV!---brxbrx 19:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Man you complain about articles a lot. There's an easy way to fix that. There's this cool "Edit" button up there. It works for more than just talk pages, you know. Quarupillow - You can't explain that! 20:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it has a SPOV. Biased yes, truthful, yes. They're a corrupt phony group. Rationalize (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'd say it comes off as angry more than snarky. And Quaru, why don't you point out some examples where I "complain about articles a lot?"--
-brxbrx 20:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- 1 2 I'm not digging further, I just noticed this was the second time today. Quarupillow - You can't explain that! 20:39, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'd say it comes off as angry more than snarky. And Quaru, why don't you point out some examples where I "complain about articles a lot?"--
- Yes, it has a SPOV. Biased yes, truthful, yes. They're a corrupt phony group. Rationalize (talk) 20:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)