There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Apologetics Press
Contributions[edit]
I'd like this page to reach the heights that the Conservapedia article has, in Snark and in content. If this goal can't be realised, then at least make the page better through contribution. I'll be logging off for tonight (editors have to sleep sometime!), I wonder how this page will "evolve" by the 'morrow!Several ingredients (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
NPOV Problem[edit]
There's an obvious NPOV problem with the article. The tone emotional and confrontational. Are we going to be rational, at all objective, or aren't we? — Unsigned, by: 70.71.235.99 / talk / contribs
- RationalWiki isn't NPOV. But I'll take a look for anything factually inaccurate.
d hominem 09:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Why is NPOV a problem?--BobSpring is sprung! 09:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- In practice, NPOV means strenuously avoiding calling a spade a spade because calling it a spade offends a few extremists. To be fair, I think the BoN is complaining that the article isn't NPOV, and they wish it was.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 10:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I wish people would stop confusing objectivity and neutrality.
moral 10:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I wish people would stop confusing objectivity and neutrality.
- In practice, NPOV means strenuously avoiding calling a spade a spade because calling it a spade offends a few extremists. To be fair, I think the BoN is complaining that the article isn't NPOV, and they wish it was.
- Why is NPOV a problem?--BobSpring is sprung! 09:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Debunking?[edit]
Is there anything that you would mind debunking in the article? Say, this http://apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=7&article=2556 or this http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=7&article=3593&topic=332 ??? The article on the age of the earth is quite nice compared to this article. (77.111.246.33 (talk) 02:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC))
This too: http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=7&article=45&topic=31 (77.111.246.33 (talk) 02:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC))