There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Aquatic species and the global flood
Wouldn't it make more sense to have the title read: "Survival of aquatic species during the global flood"? Locke Always Watching...... 17:15, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
- Ratwiki isn't interested in making sense. Bohdan
- Bohdan is a known vandal. Watch out for him. Locke
Always Watching...... 17:19, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
- Bohdan is a known vandal. Watch out for him. Locke
Yeah, trying to tie all the Global Flood articles together needs a little harmonising of the articles. Doggedpersistance 17:18, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
- Should I rename it? Locke
Always Watching...... 17:19, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
Yeah - why not take a look a the category Global Flood, and try and harmonise all the articles so they are a) more proper better titling english and have like yeah an stuff, and b) they are easier to type. I dunno how to rename articles, so if you do that I'll go round and link everything up. Doggedpersistance 17:21, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
- The whole Noah's ark story is so obviously a charming myth that an article like this almost seems like a waste of time. I mean, if God could arrange for all the animals to arrive on time and live in harmony in tight quarters for so long without starving to death or eating each other, why couldn't he arrange for all these aquatic species to survive a little change in salinity as well? Deus ex machina. Rational Ed5 or 6 edits 14:23, 31 March 2008 (EDT)