There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Atheism and world peace
Is this serious? Because I'm inclined to believe it's a parodist trying to create an RW mirror image of a Ken article. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 03:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Deletion[edit]
I put a delete tag on this, but actually, I think it could work as a fun article. Thoughts? Flubbertalk to me :D 03:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think it needs to be deleted, cause it is a "real" study, but i think it could be simplified and then just tossed onto one of the myriad of atheist pages that is most relevant.--
GodotMoi j'dis, laisse beton 03:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- As above, essay space it. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 03:38, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
This is NOT a parody.[edit]
I'm the creator of this article, and this is definitely not a parody. Please do not delete this, for this is valuable information. Thanks. Nashhinton (talk) 03:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- As mentioned above (twice), this would really work better as an essay instead of a mainspace article. Maybe just copypasta it into an essay and then have a mod delete this one. Flinttalk to me :D 03:48, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Ok, go ahead and delete it, I suppose. Nashhinton (talk) 03:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)