There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Biorhythms
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pseudoscience[edit]
This is not pseudoscience. Talsley (talk) 12:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- You'll need to prove that assertion with reference to peer reviewed studies. Bad Faith (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- Peer review is what keeps them from being excepted by mainstream scientists. Talsley (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- You're really quite funny in a village idiot sort of way. Bad Faith (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- Just because you went to some fancy-pants elitist college doesn't mean you are smarter than me. Talsley (talk) 14:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- You're really quite funny in a village idiot sort of way. Bad Faith (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- Peer review is what keeps them from being excepted by mainstream scientists. Talsley (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)