2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

Talk:Biorhythms

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon pseudoscience.svg

This Pseudoscience related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

Pseudoscience[edit]

This is not pseudoscience. Talsley (talk) 12:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

You'll need to prove that assertion with reference to peer reviewed studies. Bad Faith (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Peer review is what keeps them from being excepted by mainstream scientists. Talsley (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
You're really quite funny in a village idiot sort of way. Bad Faith (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Just because you went to some fancy-pants elitist college doesn't mean you are smarter than me. Talsley (talk) 14:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
(Warning: Poe's Law in action!) Bad Faith (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Now your just sticking your fingers in your ears. You can't prove me wrong, so you resort to mockery! Talsley (talk) 14:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
We'll start with
  • Hines, T.M., "Comprehensive review of biorhythm theory". Psychology Department, Pace University, Pleasantville, NY. Psychol Rep. 1998 Aug;83(1):19–64. (ed. concluded that biorhythm theory is not valid.)
Next. Bad Faith (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)