Talk:Biorhythms

	This Pseudoscience related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Pseudoscience

This is not pseudoscience. Talsley (talk) 12:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

You'll need to prove that assertion with reference to peer reviewed studies. Bad Faith (talk) 12:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Peer review is what keeps them from being excepted by mainstream scientists. Talsley (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

You're really quite funny in a village idiot sort of way. Bad Faith (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Just because you went to some fancy-pants elitist college doesn't mean you are smarter than me. Talsley (talk) 14:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

^{(Warning: Poe's Law in action!)} Bad Faith (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Now your just sticking your fingers in your ears. You can't prove me wrong, so you resort to mockery! Talsley (talk) 14:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

We'll start with

• Hines, T.M., "Comprehensive review of biorhythm theory". Psychology Department, Pace University, Pleasantville, NY. Psychol Rep. 1998 Aug;83(1):19–64. (ed. concluded that biorhythm theory is not valid.)

Next. Bad Faith (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)