User talk:Talsley

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Talsley.

This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble.

We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives.

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you.

If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Why? What did I do wrong? Talsley (talk) 15:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Your edits to the Maharishi article were without citation. Granted, what you removed wasn't cited either, but on this wiki such claims are allowed so long as they're easily verifiable. Also, your talk page edits expose you as a crank. You're free to stick around, but you won't be very popular.--User:Brxbrx/sig 15:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I am not a crank. That was a smear attack on the Maharishi! I was improving the article! Talsley (talk) 15:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
It's not an uncommon allegation. A better improvement would be to refute the claim, with citations. That would certainly not be reverted.--User:Brxbrx/sig 15:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
But how do I cite a person? Talsley (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Find a website that refutes the allegations of sexual misconduct by the Maharishi, then put the url between these tags:<ref>www/</ref>. Do try and find a reputable site, and not just some blog. You may also cite magazines, books, or newspapers, but that's a little trickier.--User:Brxbrx/sig 15:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
No, I mean citing my friend Hope. Talsley (talk) 15:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
You can't just cite your friend. It has to be something of scholarly significance. Maybe your friend has written something on the matter, or can point you to whatever led her to form this opinion in the first place?--User:Brxbrx/sig 15:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Now listen. Hope is a very intelligent and spiritual person, she runs our retreats. I'm not spending my social security on a fraud! Talsley (talk) 15:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Go to google. Type in Mahrishi sex scandal. Find results which proclaim his innocence. Give me the results and I'll add them to the article myself.--User:Brxbrx/sig 15:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Google isn't giving me anything. I'll have to ask Hope next time I see her. Talsley (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I am of the opinion that this user is a parodist.[edit]

I place this here for purposes of informing others who entertain similar suspicions, and for discussion.--User:Brxbrx/sig 16:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

I am of the opinion that you are a gullible moron. Talsley (talk) 16:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I am of the opinion that socks abound.--BobSpring is sprung! 17:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I am not wearing any socks right now, and why do you care? Talsley (talk) 17:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I am of the opinion that Brxbrx is a loudmouthed dropout with bad judgment and an overinflated sense of himself who you should disregard lest he get the negative attention he was seeking. Oh shit... Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 17:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
No, this user is actually a parodist. A really bad one at that. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Rather than answering me, you say "she's a parodist". If that doesn't show you have no proof nothing does. Talsley (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Seriously, people, stop bothering. Not even a paultard could manage this combination of absurd liberal and conservative stereotypes. He's a parodist.--User:Brxbrx/sig 18:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Ron Paul is an idiot. Talsley (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Pi*10^5 block for trollery[edit]

See you tomorrow, Talsley. Try not to be a dick when you come back. EVDebs (talk) 18:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

See, if I had done that, Nutty Roux would be swallowing down his bile--User:Brxbrx/sig 18:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I don't think any of your spite, noob, or IP blocks was that short. But thanks for randomly mentioning me yet again. I must figure very prominently in your life. I am proud. Nutty Roux100x100 anarchy symbol.svg 15:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Typical liberals, denying me my 1st amendment rights. Talsley (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
If you're out to prove you're not a troll, you might not want to say stupid stuff like this. (ʞlɐʇ) ɹǝɯɯɐHʍoƆ 14:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm smelling Poe, but that's the thing about Poe, you never know until you see the smiley. Bad Faith (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
You ridicule me, but you have only offered few shreds of evidence. Talsley (talk) 14:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
a few shreds of evidence - which is far more than you have offered. All you offer is unfounded poppycock. Bad Faith (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Belief is more important than evidence. And any evidence I offer will just run contrary to your liberal indoctrination! Talsley (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Now I am calling Poe. Just when I was having fun you go and ruin it by overcooking the goose. Bad Faith (talk) 15:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
How do you think prayer works? Talsley (talk) 15:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Badly. Bad Faith (talk) 15:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Then how does God talk to me? Talsley (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
There is no god, you're only hearing the echoes of your own mind. Bad Faith (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I meditate for 3 hours a day, and God talks to me. I can hear his voice in my mind. You are listening to psychobabble. Talsley (talk) 15:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Well, one of us is, that's for sure. Incidentally this organisation is for those who hear voices. Bad Faith (talk) 15:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Are you implying that I am crazy? Talsley (talk) 17:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Not necessarily. For example, I think you just have a thing for shit-stirring. EVDebs (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I am attempting to turn this website to reality, rather than the fantasy-land you believe in. Talsley (talk) 19:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

"I am a strong believer in the South."[edit]

Like my 6-year-old is a strong believer in Santa Claus? B♭maj7 "Voted in two different votes, but there was never a vote." 15:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I think it's a conspiracy of cartographers. They're all in it together, financed by Big Pharma. Bad Faith (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Southern values like charity, kindness, politeness, and family. You fools probably have been brainwashed into thinking that the civil war was about slavery. Everyone knows that it truthfully was about State's Rights. There's a reason the South has the lowest crime rate in the world. Talsley (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Another unfounded and untrue assertion. I'll bet your eyes are brown, that's how full of shit you are. Bad Faith (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Mind your tongue. Talsley (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The civil war was largely a conflict of different cultures. The south was an agraic honor-society, the North an industrial, urban (as much as that was possible at the time) and liberal (again, for that time). The only reason it was also about slavery is because the Southerners would have had to pay actual money to get workforce then. Puts a whole new meaning to "wage slavery". I want evidence for the crime rate thing - no wait that's bullshit anyway. --ʤɱ atheist 15:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
When I was growing up on the Eastern Shore, there was never a crime in town. When I lived in Mississippi, nobody needed to lock their doors at night. Talsley (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
When you lived in Mississippi you could walk home safely at night by the light of the burning crosses. Bad Faith (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I never saw a single one. Cross burning and flag burning should be illegal. Talsley (talk) 15:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
As the late, great, Nina Simone sang, Everybody knows about Mississippi Goddam - or maybe she was a shill for Big Pharma. Bad Faith (talk) 15:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Never heard of her. Talsley (talk) 15:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Ah, Nina. Now SHE was a good sock puppet.Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 16:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC) "Ne me quitte pas..."

Unblock me[edit]

You cowards! Attacking an old lady and censoring me! Talsley (talk) 15:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Who you are and how old you are doesn't matter. It's your behavior that earned you the block. EVDebs (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
No. You should respect your elders. Talsley (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Yeah well I'm way older than you, so respect me! Go make me a pie! (ʞlɐʇ) ɹǝɯɯɐHʍoƆ 17:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I'm old, no one censors me. What the hell kind of discrimination is this. I demand my equal attention to be censored!Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 17:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
  • sigh* Do you get your jollies acting like a stereotype on the net? Because I just can't buy that you actually mean this. EVDebs (talk) 18:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I get my "follies" from watching "Have Gun Will Travel" and "The Wild Wild West". Talsley (talk) 18:11, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Well then, that makes everything... something... EVDebs (talk) 18:23, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Clearly you don't like Westerns. Talsley (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Nor do you. Now if you'd cited Once Upon A Time In The West or Destry Rides Again - then you would have scored some kudos. Bad Faith (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I have been blocked yet again. Please cease your censorship. Talsley (talk) 19:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

And again I have been blocked for daring to stand up to oppression. Talsley (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

The red menace approaches[edit]

Assimilation.gif We are coming for you. Blue (pester) 17:33, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

The youth today. I have no hope for America, unless we disenfranchise everyone who cannot pass a government literacy test. Talsley (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
And the blacks, and the gays, and the Jews and the... Oops, I've come over all Godwin. I need a shower. Bad Faith (talk) 17:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Incidentally, Blue, if you're the red menace and you're blue doesn't that make you the purple menace? Bad Faith (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Shh, just come. Blue (pester) 17:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Nonsense, I have a friend who is black, and although a union worker, is an altogether pleasant fellow. Talsley (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Stealthy as a socialist, it slithers up our shores... Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 18:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
You are all drug addicts then. That explains so much. Talsley (talk) 18:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
You're right. Better not stick around too long, or you might be overcome by peer pressure. (ʞlɐʇ) ɹǝɯɯɐHʍoƆ 18:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I think for myself, I don't let other people think for me. Liberalism is all about submission. Talsley (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
It's true, my friend Harry Anslinger told me smoking dope turns you into a Red. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 18:05, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Or nazis like Ron Paul. I hate that man. Talsley (talk) 18:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Liberalism is all about submission - indeed, it's all about submitting to the ruling classes and taking their scab wages and working conditions without protest. Oh, what a deluded fool I have been all these years! Bad Faith (talk) 19:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Exactly. The freer the market, the freer the people. Talsley (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Actually, liberalism is only about submission if you're into that sort of thing; you can be a domme if you want too. However, the important thing to remember is that the sub is actually the one in charge. EVDebs (talk) 19:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Is this still about politics? --ʤɱ constructivist 20:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes. Obviously the cultural and business elites are liberals, and the submissive masses are liberals as well. They prostate themselves for the dole, having taxes and regulation rammed down their throat. Talsley (talk) 20:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Tal, Tal, Tal. I presume you have interests you want protected, yes? Well, so do liberals. Government, when properly performing its function, is meant to do that in an impartial manner. And it's not about sucking off the dole, it's about having what you need to be a productive member of society. Conservatives do the same thing; they either just don't acknowledge it or assume everyone else doesn't deserve it. But on some level, you know this already. EVDebs (talk) 22:11, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I am a supporter of the endangered species act. Talsley (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


Where have I committed the act of vandalism? Talsley (talk) 20:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I am still waiting for an answer, or have you blocked me for disagreeing with you? Talsley (talk) 20:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
You're either a Poe or an idiot. I'm inclined to believe the former, since your goal seems to be just to cause trouble with every edit you make, and you appear to take every pseudoscientific claim at face value. Keep in mind we are not Wikipedia, nor do we try to be. (ʞlɐʇ) ɹǝɯɯɐHʍoƆ 21:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I do not believe the moon landing was fake. I am not a young earth creationist. I am do not believe the world is flat. Facts are subject to interpretation. Talsley (talk) 21:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
So you accept some science because it makes you feel superior to the woo-woos, but you reject other science because it doesn't fit your ideology. Gotcha. EVDebs (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Isn't that what you do? Talsley (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Heh. Touche. MtDPinko Scum 22:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
If you consider "best possible guess based on the existing data" an ideology, I guess so. As it happens, that's how we're supposed to do things around here. EVDebs (talk) 22:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

You have now admitted that your position is unsound. Talsley (talk) 22:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Only in your rather warped view of the world. You, on the other hand, have proven nothing except that you're here to troll and annoy. EVDebs (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
You just stated that you use guesses. Therefore you admit you may not be correct. Talsley (talk) 22:25, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
That's how science works. That's what we try to do around here. If a guess doesn't pan out, part of explaining that is trying to explain why it seemed to work the first time around. Do try to keep up. EVDebs (talk) 22:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, it has been 60 years since I last took a course, but it sounds like you just said that science is mere guesswork. Talsley (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
That isn't what I said and I'm reasonably certain you know that. Educated guesswork. Emphasis on "educated'. EVDebs (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
But our schools and colleges are now little more than indoctrination centers. How can most people who went to school post 1970s be considered educated? Talsley (talk) 22:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
blah blah blah talking point blah blah blah equivocation blah blah blah have you nothing better to say? EVDebs (talk) 22:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Again, the resorting to ridicule. Talsley (talk) 22:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
That's usually how I treat people who I think are debating in bad faith, yes. EVDebs (talk) 22:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

You're back in the shitter[edit]

For an hour or so. You know why. MtDPinko Scum 21:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

You keep censoring me because you are afraid. And please mind your language. Talsley (talk) 21:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
No, I'm censoring you because you're boring and I'm a bit of a bastard. Keep it up and expect to spend longer spells on the bricks. MtDPinko Scum 21:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
You probably are a bastard with the complete destruction of marriage. Talsley (talk) 21:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I've unblocked you and moved you to the vandal bin. one edit every half-hour. Use it wisely. B♭maj7 "Voted in two different votes, but there was never a vote." 21:50, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I have unbinned you on the provision that you cease vandalizing articles. Feel free to ramble on talkpages. TyTy 22:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

"please mind your language"[edit]

fuck, shit, cunt, whore, bitch, ass, wanker, arse, cock, bloody, arseface, bugger, crap, cocksucker, dick, boner, dipshit, faggot and that's all that come to mind right now. And I'm not even a native. --ʤɱ secularist 21:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I'll pray for you. Talsley (talk) 22:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Don't waste your time. I like it hot anyways. --ʤɱ heretic 13:44, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
So wait, on a cognitive level here, language is a creature of the mind, since it's formed before we actively make it; it's also a biological creature of the biological brain since it exits in our heads, without anyone teaching it to us. So when you say "mind your language", what does that mean, exactly. That we should move our language from the biological brain to the metaphsyical/philosopical mind? and if so, what, if not language, is there already. and how exactly can we do this. I'm sure it's something to do with chemistry.
He is saying crude words, most likely due to the liberals control of music and television. Those words are primarily spoken by the seedier elements of society for a reason. Talsley (talk) 14:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
There are plants in our society? no shit?Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 14:12, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Oh, deary me, Talsley, no, no, no, no, no! The image you're trying to portray is an uptight virgin librarian from Texas, not Schafly in a skirt. You need something more along the lines of "He is saying nasty words, just like I hear on those awful television programs. I cannot abide such filth on my talk page. I will insist on decency." If she's (you're) to blame liberals you need something like, "My pastor, the Reverend A Nalprobe, tells me that it's because the commies taking over Hollywood.". See what I mean? Bad Faith (talk) 14:17, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

I have never been to Texas and my late ex-husband was a construction worker. He said those words every time he got home from work. I do not go to church, I believe in a personal relationship with God. The pastor gets in the way. As to WaitingforGodot, plants have their own society, go read "The Secret Lives of Plants". Talsley (talk) 14:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Nah, we aren't allowed to speak freely (yes, you are reading correctly) so that the "good Christian" parts of society don't have to think of the evil act of sexual intercourse. Now, I'm not saying you are a bitch, whore, cunt or anything that stands up there, I'm just saying that I will not give a shit about somebody who reminds me to "watch my language". It's the burqa for language. --ʤɱ pervert 14:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
You can't even spell. Such are the new school systems. The only grade is "L" which indicates that learning is taking place. We don't want the morons to feel bad about failing, so we do this to boost "self-esteem." What is "self-esteem?" Nothing, it doesn't exist. Talsley (talk) 14:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Ok, now even I am sure that you are parodist. Whatever "new system" you're talking about, I wasn't part of it. Hint: I'm not from the USA. --ʤɱ socialist 14:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
And now you result to accusations. Not being from America is no excuse, this is an English website, you should know English. Look up "outcome based education". Talsley (talk) 14:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Nicely done. Still not funny though. Remember, we are laughing at the idiots of CP on a daily basis. You should bring something stronger with the next sock. --ʤɱ anti-communist 14:58, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

So you have admitted that you are just attacking me in an attempt to twist me to your viewpoint. Talsley (talk) 15:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Isn't that the definition of a discussion? Although, I fail to see where "parodist" is an attack... --ʤɱ kant 15:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I base my viewpoints off of facts. You base yours of of the communist indoctrination you have received since 1990. There is no hope for Europe now save intervention. Talsley (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

odeur de chaussette[edit]

Am I alone in wondering exactly whose sweaty foot is wearing this sock? Of course, I have my theories but idle talk costs lives. Bad Faith (talk) 21:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
I think maybe it's me. i forgot to wash my feet yesterday night.Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 21:51, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
That's it. I'm making socks called mauvaise foi, nausea, and maybe Beauvoir.--User:Brxbrx/sig 22:05, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
How can a beau voir, stink. I'm sure it should be mal sense, then. and who would want to read a book by malsense. Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 15:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

I like you, let's keep talking[edit]

I have never stalked someone. time to try somethign new! learning new tricks and all...Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 18:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Get a job. Talsley (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Am I allowed to stalk you? I have a job. (ʞlɐʇ) ɹǝɯɯɐHʍoƆ 19:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I have a job. I sell crafts that i make from the used popcan plastic rings. Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 19:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
That's not gainful employment. Talsley (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Wait godot, like chainmail technique stuff? I make chainmail too! I enjoy finding others who do. X Stickman (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I make kitties. sometimes puppies. it's hard to tell what they look like. but it's ok. I sell them for 10c a piece, but given how much soda the kids drink a day, (at least 100 cans per day, all 13 kids) it gives me enough to make money. Plus, you know, the social security. and the illegal husband contributes.Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 20:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
You people are reason my social security checks are going to get cut. I do have to eat you know. Talsley (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
OHHH poor thing. He hasn't worked in nearly 3 years, cause he's illegal, you know. So he gets a check from unemployment. we do ok on that. plus the food all the kids get. food stamps and all. And the disability for being so fat. Thank god i got knocked up at 15, cause it means i never had to work a day in my life. the US, be some good place to live.Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 20:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Are they chainmail kitties? Like this? X Stickman (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Sillyness aside, those are cool, are they yours?Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 20:44, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I wish. This is the extent of my chainmail sculpting abilities, and I assure you, many swears were uttered during the creation of that little guy (although I've since refined the process down to one or two swears only, and only one of those is a bad one). X Stickman (talk) 20:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I have no artistic talent what so-ever. In reality, i used to do beading, while working on the Reservations, and i've done some basket weaving, but mostly i was just laughed at. I was fine with the techniques, but they were just silly in any pattern i put in. But, it passed the time as i talked to the elders.Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 21:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

I have not worked for 13 years, as I am retired. You are just lazy and need to get a job. Social security should only be availablke to the retired, anything else is pure welfare and unjust. Talsley (talk) 20:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Wrong, Social Security started off as a bone von Bismarck threw to the socialists to keep them from squawking too much. It's a communist Ponzi scheme. REDSREDSREDSREDSREDSREDS!!!!!! Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 20:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Your source is disreputable. In addition, it is not communism you get as much as you put in. Talsley (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
REDSREDSREDSREDSREDSREDS!!!!!! What a great template. Blue (pester) 20:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
You again. Suffice to say missy, when my block expires you will feel the lash of my tongue. Talsley (talk) 20:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Nice try, Marcus. Röstigraben (talk) 21:00, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
My name is Alice, not Marcus. What are you going on about? Talsley (talk) 21:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
But it's so much more fun not to work. I mean, imagine if i had to go do a day's work. there's some power plant that's bound to want me. Pink mowse.pngGodotThe Peyote God awaits 21:43, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

You have no skill of measurable worth. Talsley (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

You have nothing of value to say. Convenient, no? EVDebs (talk) 00:28, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

What commitment![edit]

Keep up the good work! Clapping.gif Blue (pester) 21:27, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Laugh now hussy. Talsley (talk) 21:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


I am being repeatedly blocked by the user called WaitingforGodot due to disagreeing with her. Talsley (talk) 23:00, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Being blocked is a sign of affection here. Know how many times I've been blocked? Neither do I, because it happens so rarely as no one likes me. You should be flattered that you're so popular. X Stickman (talk) 23:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, but now I cannot help others. I am only able to edit this page. Talsley (talk) 23:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Your whiny kvetching has moved me. I have unblocked you. But my mercy has limits. You are back in the vandal bin. 1 edit in each 30 minutes. Play nicely for a while and see what happens. MtDPinko Scum 00:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Yet I am unable to post a response on Blue's talk page. Talsley (talk) 12:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


I find it humorous how much you rail against the editors here for their perceived reliance on welfare, yet you yourself have admitted to being on social security. ArchieGoodwin (talk) 13:35, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

I earned that it is my money. Not welfare. Talsley (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
FHA loans, Medicare, Interstate highways, Federal student loan programs, public schools, clean air, clean water, electricity out in the sticks, the Internet, the National Weather Service... all paid for with your (and our) money as well, and you've probably used most if not all of those at one time or another. (Yes, including the NWS, indirectly.) Your point? EVDebs (talk) 18:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Nonsense, the looters have forced all that on us at the barrel of a gun, because, as we all know, democracy is gang rape. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 19:48, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Your metaphor is crude and perverted, but essentially correct. The people have voted themselves bred and circuses, just like they did in Europe and Canada. Talsley (talk) 19:50, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
True, things have gone downhill since we started letting the moochers vote. Back to white, male, landed aristocracy only! Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 20:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

The Darkies[edit]

"Nonsense, I have a friend who is black, and although a union worker, is an altogether pleasant fellow. Talsley (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2011 (UTC)"

You have "a black friend"? That's just adorable!! Ironclad (talk) 14:46, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Unbin me[edit]

Please. I am not a vandal. Talsley (talk) 02:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure that's true. You seem to have accumulated a great deal of criticism and anger for your edits here.
Are you sure you're not a vandal?--ADtalkModerator 02:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
To wit: your edits to Oscillococcinum and Nancy Pelosi.--ADtalkModerator 02:21, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
(edit conflict) He's made boring repetitive revisions to established articles. He edit wars and inserts unfounded, uncited crank opinions everywhere. If we can get him to promise to stop, maybe we can unbin him?--User:Brxbrx/sig 02:21, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Fair enough.
Okay, Talsley. I'll unbin you. We're a very forgiving people here, even though it looks like you've been through this before and Ty probably regretted unbinning you once. But someone else'll slap you right back in if you keep up your pattern of edits.--ADtalkModerator 02:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you sir, you are a gentleman. Talsley (talk) 02:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
AD is a gentleman. Please keep your gibbering to talk pages. Tytalk 02:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

this user is opposed to communism[edit]

So why are you opposed to communism? I rather think that the idea of personal property has limited advantages, when we are talking natural resources. Why should oil not be a shared resource, when it's part of our national heratige. Why should some Big Company make money off the trees that are in our natural forests? --Pink mowse.pngGodotGrow a vagina 17:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

A big company should not, as corporations are a malign influence on the United States. Communist's surrendering of all things to the government is exactly what Ben Franklin warned about. All the totalitarianism of a monarchy without even the freedom to better yourself economically. Talsley (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
What about anarcho-communism? Fuck capitilism Scherben 09:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Mind your tongue. Talsley (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


You don't like "Big Business", and you don't like state control. Pray tell us, where on the Gramscian-Spinozian spectrum of Moderate Enterprise (and no, don't try Wikipeding it - the internet is a tad behind in such unexciting matters of International Political Economy) do you stand?

Or, as a plausible alternative; what makes you subscribe to the Mercantilist philosophy as opposed to Hjamlmar De Groende's Theory of Monopolist Accumulation...? Ironclad (talk) 23:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I think you're just throwing words at me. Talsley (talk) 00:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
I have to agree there, actually. Scarlet A.pngpostate 00:28, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
In which case I recommend: Bottomore, T (1983) Dictionary of Marxist Thought, Oxford:Oxford University Press. Ironclad (talk) 00:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Shame. I was looking forward to an economics discussion. Ironclad (talk) 00:10, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
May I offer my sincere contrafilbularities quotering the inability of you to demarcantorise the largess and ontrophilotrophgy of the english language. AceModerator 00:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
This is what academics do, mock the elderly with words they have made up. Talsley (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
I think with "made up" she means "renewed into the modern language from older languages from people that were even older". Ah, darn all those young twentisomething professors! --ʤɱ socialist 00:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
You have embiggened this page with your restisaful utterage. AceModerator 00:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Are you an English major? Talsley (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
That's unpossible! Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 00:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Damn those English academics always learning society their new words. 00:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Seriously, Talsley, just quit. You're an obvious troll, just dump this account and get a new one. Nobody will take anything you say seriously enough to get mad at you after a couple of days. If you'd like, I can permaban this account and let you try again. RachelW (talk) 00:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Felicitatious salutations, my Antipodean frateris familias! How was your intoxicating imbibment of the preceding solar sojourn? My heartiest cognescients to your spouse!
What tickles me in this is that Madam's emphasis on small business is so dreadfully Leninist. Marx identified - to crudely paraphrase - the succession of control from state, to small business, to corporate monopolies, back to state controlled corporations, then revolution, then communism. Yet while Marx identified Big Business as the genesis of the communist revolution, Lenin argued it was the small businesses; those still independent enough to think for themselves rather than being the mindless drones of machine-hall and market. So Madame Talsley here is a Leninist. Lovely! Been to Moscow, Madam? I highly recommend visiting Lenin's tomb. He'd appreciate your effort. Ironclad (talk) 00:25, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Is that the propaganda you've been taught? Sickening. Talsley (talk) 00:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Nobody taught me it, my dear. Lenin's theories are right there in black and white for all the world to see. They have been since 1917. Open a book for once. You'll be astonished what you find. Ironclad (talk) 00:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Sadly though my dear, I'll have to end this on my part. You don't possess the requisite background knowledge and you can't discuss economics without it; no more than I can discuss jet propulsion or Japanese poetry without first opening a book on the subject. But fear not; none of us were born with such knowledge, and we all acquired it somewhere. I highly recommend: Galbraith, J (1987)A History of Economics: the past as the present, London: Hamish Hamilton Publishers. Go on, give it a go. Not that long ago, I too opened it for the first time. Give it a go. If you're going to fly the flag for laissez-faire Spinozian small-business economic systems, you might as well know the relevant theories. Enjoy! Ironclad (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Glebbet snidjol do fabbleweck dishni she poogarpa. Eppendorx, ja favnexiu e kwaidkop do blashi fevedo, zo kerbel-kerbel bebble. EVDebs (talk) 01:03, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Whoa man, there's no need to go there... Sam Tally-ho! 01:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Chumble spuzz, man. Chumble fuckin spuzz. EVDebs (talk) 01:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Are you so doped up you can only reply with profanity and gibberish? Talsley (talk) 17:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


We're on to you. We know you're a secret communist spy sent to put up a smoke screen to make people think all commie-hunters (like you're pretending to be) are uneducated imbeciles. We urge you to stop at once. Cow...Hammertime! 19:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

You are an uneducated ignoramus of a pizza man. Talsley (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Still no coherent response, commie. Cow...Hammertime! 19:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
What's wrong with a pizza man? They risk life and limb to bring delicious, tasty pizza to your door. -- Seth Peck (talk) 19:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
How can you find fulfillment in such a career? Talsley (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
If I remember correctly the bizarre story I made up a few months ago to you, I was a homeless pizza thief, not a pizza man. Get it straight. Cow...Hammertime! 19:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Even less than previously expected. Has the commie hoochie-mama gotten a job yet? Talsley (talk) 19:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


Why can I not edit other pages? Talsley (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Because you're a troll. You make obviously false and provocative statements in order to get a reaction. And you haven't bothered learning anything since WWII.] Sophiebecause liberals 19:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Yes I have. Talsley (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
So you either lied then or you are lying now. Which one is it? Sophiebecause liberals 19:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
I have learned about nature rather than history. Talsley (talk) 19:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
(EC)You got blocked for a moment there. Tone it down, please. Peter Monomorium antarcticum 19:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


You... you DID SOMETHING! CopperheadHisssssss 18:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

What are you jabbering about? Talsley (talk) 18:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


You have been blocked again. Try to keep the personal attacks to a minimum okie-dokie? CopperheadHisssssss 16:38, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I don't mind Talsley. Blue (pester) 17:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
I sincerely apologize, I presume you were being sarcastic. I really do believe you should reevaluate your views however. Talsley (talk) 17:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


How do I make essays? I have seen several and would like to write a few. Talsley (talk) 18:46, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

See here. I'm looking forward to the lulz. Cow...Hammertime! 19:07, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Checkin' you out.[edit]

Man. El TajDon't make me do stuff 15:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Er, woman. Redchuck.gif ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science.Moderator 15:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
I beg your pardon? Talsley (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh, you're a woman. My apologies. I am seeking amusement and Tyrannis advised I check you out. El TajDon't make me do stuff 15:17, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
You are seeking amusement here? I suggest you read the articles on left wing politicians such as Nancy Pelosi, the lies contained within are most amusing. Talsley (talk) 15:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
"Nancy Pelosi was the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives from the January 2007 to January 2011." You're right, that was amusing. El TajDon't make me do stuff 15:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
The article has been censored of my attempts to expose her for the communist she is! And supporting Big Pharma's stooge Obama. Talsley (talk) 15:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
So I see. Your arguments are convincing indeed. Blue obviously reverted you per Nancy's request at the September 2011 Communist meeting. I also loathe people who eat, drink, fornicate and die. Those are for the weak and I myself had chlorophyll injections several years ago so I can sustain myself solely through sunlight or bright lamps. El TajDon't make me do stuff 15:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


If you are calling any modern Democrat a "communist", I don't know what you would be calling JFK, RFK, FDR, Dennis Kucinich, and Bernie Sanders, who are all similar in views to Minority Leader Pelosi or more liberal. I also wonder who you would call a "centrist". Ron Paul? Mr. Anon (talk) 16:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Paul is a Nazi. Romney is a centrist. 19:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC) — Unsigned, by: Talsley / talk / contribs 19:11, 08 June 2012 (UTC)
So you admit that Nazis represent the right wing? That is good. But you still haven't answered my question. What would you call the Kennedies, Roosevelt, Kucinich, Sanders, Lee, etc? Mr. Anon (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Communists. Talsley (talk) 15:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Ron Paul is not right wing. He is in his own fantasy universe which defies description. Talsley (talk) 15:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Paul is right wing, as you can see in the source I gave.
And here is where you have fallen for my trap card. FDR was not a communist. He made this very clear through his policies, where his regulations were intended to preserve the free market, not destroy it. His New Deal relied heavily on private-sector cooperation. During his campaign, he actually accused Hoover of being a "socialist" and his attempts to balance the budget actually caused a double-dip recession. Roosevelt was a liberal, not a communist. If he was a communist, he would have nationalized all the banks, but instead he just bailed them out.
Same with the modern-day Senators and Congresspeople that I pointed out. Bernie Sanders, a Democratic Socialist, has no intention of putting all industry in public control; rather he believes that certain sectors, such as health and education, are best left to the people to control, while other sectors like technology should be in the hands of the private sector. Mr. Anon (talk) 16:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Liberals are communists. Deny it all you like. Talsley (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Directly from the dictionary:
Communism: a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.
Left-wing politics: a concern for those in society who are disadvantaged relative to others and an assumption that there are unjustified inequalities (which right-wing politics views as natural or traditional) that should be reduced or abolished.
Clearly, those are two different things.
Oh, I can't believe I forgot about my Kennedy trap card! Are you really going to argue that John Fucking Kennedy was a communist? The guy who tried to assassinate Fidel Castro (and according to some theories got assassinated in return) and fought the Soviet Union hard? Mr. Anon (talk) 04:20, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Talsley, if we permabanned people for being irrational, you'd be pretty high on my hit list. Words have meanings, and as a general rule you don't get to decide what they are, nor do you get to tell people what they believe. Do try to get up to speed on that terminology thing. EVDebs (talk) 01:31, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

It's been a while[edit]


It's been ages since you graced us with your wit and wisdom. Innocent Bystander (talk) 16:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Talsley (talk) 16:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
And, once again, you brighten my day with your charmless inanities deep insights. I wish you would post more often. Innocent Bystander (talk) 15:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I agree with the sentiment above me: you should post far more often than you currently do. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 16:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I get the distinct impression you are mocking me. Talsley (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Not at all. Not at all. In fact, we need more people like you around here to keep the rest of the community on their toes. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 14:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Talsley (talk) 15:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

You were certainly entertaining...[edit]

...but your screeds could've used more John Birch Society-esque conservative self-victimization and self-righteousness. I mean, if you're going to bring the crazy (and do you ever), why not bring ALL the crazy? You know, for entertainment purposes? It's adorable! ;-) Lucas Don Velour (talk) 20:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)