Talk:Blobsquatch

is this really necessary? AMassiveGay (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

I like to think so. It's a popular neologism and gives some important history. It has an interesting history in that it's actually a term that originated first among cryptozoologists but has become popular in skeptical circles. --Mindme (talk) 00:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

does it need a whole article, or accurately a stub? i dont think so. its more suited to a glossary AMassiveGay (talk) 00:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

xkcd for Jan 25, 2022 seems very appropriate to this article... [1] ^{— Unsigned, by: Kencolt / talk / contribs}

That's a good one. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 02:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Added to external links. Thanks! --Mindme (talk) 15:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

And another one, same source, also new, and... heh. [2] Kencolt (talk) 23:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

not seeing anything that warrants this being an article or anything that would make this more than a stub. its neologism thats means a fuzzy picture. theres nothing more to it than that. AMassiveGay (talk) 23:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

there is no scope for it to be anymore than a stub AMassiveGay (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)