User talk:Cosmikdebris

ACHTUNG! ALLES LOOKENSPEEPERS! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mitten grabben. Ist easy schnappen der springen werk, blowenfusen und poppencorken mit spitzensparken. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen. Das rubbernecken sichtseeren keepen das cotten-pickenen hans in das pockets muss; relaxen und watchen das blinkenlichten.

Archives for this page

Board nomination

Some guy nominated you or something. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 14:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

A thing you should look at

On the Board Discord channel, at your earliest convenience. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 19:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I will investigate. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 20:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Nassim Haramein

In the article Nassim Haramein, you replaced content with "

This article has been temporarily removed from the wiki due to legal action.

". But why? RationalThinker (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@RationalThinker Just what it says. I apologize in advance, but I am not going to comment publicly on this matter. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 20:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I just asked what are the legal issues. And what did you mean by "I am not going to comment publicly on this matter"?RationalThinker (talk) 21:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@RationalThinker Ok. Sorry if I seemed so abrupt with the response. It seems that the named individual has initiated a lawsuit against the foundation for this page. Until we can formulate a proper response, I thought it would be proper to hide the page. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 21:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Ok no problem. When the issued would have been solved, just make sure to rewrite the article.RationalThinker (talk) 21:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Board meeting

The next Board meeting is 18 August at 1700 UTC on the Discord channel. We have an actually important topic this time, of which you are already aware. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 20:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

@DuceMoosolini It's in my calendar. I'll be there. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 20:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Redirect

I hope you don’t mind, but I deleted the redirect for Suharto since we agreed to have the article focus on himself rather than his family. Rational Dude enter thy lair 17:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

No worries. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 18:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Rational Dude enter thy lair 19:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for moving the article too btw, I didn’t know if I should’ve moved it myself without permission since I felt it might’ve been drastic. Rational Dude enter thy lair 13:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

My edit

I removed the “family rogues gallery” section because it’s not needed, it’s only about Suharto and it would fit better in a draft I could make for his children individually. So can I remove it? Rational Dude enter thy lair 18:13, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

I disagree that it’s not needed. Please do not remove it until any replacement article(s) are created and out of draft space. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 18:15, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Sure. Should I make one right now and put it there for convenience? Rational Dude enter thy lair 18:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

There’s no hurry. We are all volunteers here. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 18:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Ok. I just don’t feel that it fits for the page except for a brief mention. Rational Dude enter thy lair 20:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Request

Instead of removing the section, can I remake it to be smaller but still fit the article? A lot of the information doesn’t have much to do with Suharto himself. Rational Dude enter thy lair 00:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Umaru16

May I open an atim about him? He's become pretty problematic and sometimes downright annoying with his questionable edits. Rational Dude enter thy lair 02:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Actually, I think a block would be more sufficient. Rational Dude enter thy lair 17:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Rational Dude I am not a moderator. I suggest that you try to resolve any disputes on the subject article talk page, and if that is not successful, take the subject to the moderator notice board. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 21:26, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. Rational Dude enter thy lair 22:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Joseph Smith

The term “terrorist” typically refers to individuals or groups who use violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, to achieve political goals. Joseph Smith’s actions, particularly as the leader of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), do not fit this description. He was never convicted of terrorism. This is stupid. If you use the logic you are using anyone you want can be called a terrorist, you can call Joe Biden a terrorist. What is your argument for this? I know this website is a joke, but does this mean I can call Muhamid a terrorist? ^{— Unsigned, by: LuxembourgLover / talk / contribs}

@LuxembourgLover Read Killing of Joseph Smith and see why he is considered a terrorist. Also, see RationalWiki:What is a RationalWiki article? for more details on our purpose and point of view. Also, your statement "He is the prophet of the church" is superfluous. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 20:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

@Cosmikdebris Your links prove nothing, the Wikipedia article does not even mention the word “Terrorist” as for what a RationalWiki article, also shows nothing. So I once again say, from what I understand I can edit the Muhammad a terrorist, war criminal? I mean he married Aisha who was 7. ^{— Unsigned, by: LuxembourgLover / talk / contribs}

First of all, On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you..

Just because the wikipedia article on his shenanigans in Illinois doesn't use the word terrorist, that doesn't mean his actions weren't considered terrorism. Obviously an editor here feels that these actions were egregious enough to consider him so. And please don't start chucking logical fallacies at me about Mohammed. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 20:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

No, he did not commit any terrorist acts, nor was he convicted or accused of terrorism. If you think what he did was bad, have you not seen what Mohammed did and the massacre of the Banu Qurayz? If you're going to call this basically a meme on Wikipedia, which I admit seems funny, you cannot just make fun of everyone else but when I mention expanding the meme to Mohammed, you get mad, and that's not good.LuxembourgLover (talk) 20:27, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Also so I can throw in a Wikipedia page too. I know Joseph Smith and the LDS Church is not perfect, but you are going to extremely far lengths in regards to criticism. ^{— Unsigned, by: LuxembourgLover / talk / contribs}

I strongly suggest that you take this discussion to the talk page. I have no strong stake in this argument one way or another. I do disagree with your edit replacing "self-proclaimed prophet" with "He is the prophet of the church". This is not wikipedia. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 20:41, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Tsk, tsk…

I just saw the block log. It truly is a pity when the trolls gobble up cool and interesting usernames on their throwaway accounts that don't last for even an hour before being smacked down. 😔 --Luigifan18 (talk) 03:41, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

So, on the current legal questions...

You posted the EFF response on the Saloon Bar, days have passed since, we just had the Sept 1 meeting, and well, no news. That's probably bad news by the earlier Discord discussion. If you've made any move (replying to that message from EFF), that'd be great to hear, if not, maybe if we're lucky it could be possible to get a referral on time if it's sent today; Trent would after all need to have a lawyer ready by Sept 10th or really earlier, as that's his deadline for a final action to take.

We didn't schedule a new Discord meeting, rather people can just pop in and say whatever until, well, there's some definite news. --ApooftGnegiol (talk) 17:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

"Oh yeah!"

…Looking over the edits that "Oh yeah!" was making on the Cult page, I'm not entirely sure that they were a bad-faith vandal who warrants a permanent block. On the other hand, while I don't want to dismiss them via tone argument, if they were attempting to make legitimate contributions, they way they were doing it was… pretty clueless, and they'd better have a decent defense for the stuff they were saying to me in their edit summaries and on my talk page. --Luigifan18 (talk) 14:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

…Scratch that thing I just said. It's still not completely improbable that Oh yeah!/Hen was editing in… something vaguely resembling good faith, but either way, they're an asshole. --Luigifan18 (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

…Fuck it. I tried to tell them off nicely-ish, but they just keep abusing you! I'm done trying to defend this jerk! I don't care that they're complimenting me, their treatment of you is unacceptable! Fuck this shit I'm out! --Luigifan18 (talk) 15:11, 14 September 2024 (UTC)