Information icon.svg Nominations and campaigning for the RationalWiki 2021 Moderator Election are completed. Voting is live now, until 17:00 UTC, 30 November!

Talk:Cellular cosmogony

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon pseudoastronomy.svg

This Pseudoastronomy related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.



Interesting idea, though is that worth expanding on in a section rather than a footnote? ADK...I'll edit your gas tank! 19:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Well, I don't know. It was just a fun observation. All I can say is that I think the required metric would be d(\vec{r_1}, \vec{r_2}) = \left\|\frac{\vec{r_1}}{\|\vec{r_1}\|^2} - \frac{\vec{r_2}}{\|\vec{r_2}\|^2}\right\|, assuming a Cartesian coordinate system with an origin in the center of the sphere. Giving a rigorous proof, however, is beyond my meager math skills. - LucidFox (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
    • Actually, disregard this comment. As Wikipedia helpfully points out, the "concave hollow Earth" space is derived from regular Euclidean space by the transformation r \rightarrow \frac{R^2}{r} in spherical coordinates, where R is Earth's radius. - LucidFox (talk) 06:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Some lizardfolk love for Teed[edit]

From the David Icke Forums:

IMO, the moon is a concave projection, like a bowl (the bowl theory is thanks to another member of the forum, whose name I forget). According to Cyrus Tweed, this is because the moon is a projection of the crust of the earth. I don't know about the latter being true, but the first two conjectures have evidence to support them.

In the same post, this guy claims that the Sun is a "man-made machine" shaped like an "octagonal double pyramid". Oh, and the Earth is a computer, and we live on its inner surface, massaraksh.--ZooGuard (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Even today[edit]

Really, this guy arguing with nephy is great, i had a fun time hearing this and living through it with out reality ending — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 20:53, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Digging on a cellular cosmogony[edit]

This thing is nutty, but for a fantasy world is pretty cool. Have been any words on what would happen if you digged deeper and deeper on that world? (ie: beginning in but ending on New Zealand) --Panzerfaust (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

You're a bunch of freaks[edit]

I'll not spoil it for those who arrive to this article for the first time, but thanks for the laughs I had when I discovered what means "Massaraksh".

And I'll repeat again: sure this is woo of the finest quality but it's a quite neat idea for a fantasy novel. I guess the world would wrap around and be self-contained; you for example dig on Italy and end up on New Zealand. I'll think deeper on this bullshit cosmology model. --Panzerfaust (talk) 10:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

If only...[edit]

… more 'groups supporting offbeat ideas' added to the sum of human happiness by enabling the creation of parks etc. Anna Livia (talk) 10:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)