Talk:Cellular cosmogony

This Pseudoastronomy related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Metrics[edit]

Interesting idea, though is that worth expanding on in a section rather than a footnote? ADK^{...I'll edit your gas tank!} 19:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Well, I don't know. It was just a fun observation. All I can say is that I think the required metric would be $d({\vec {r_{1}}},{\vec {r_{2}}})=\left\|{\frac {\vec {r_{1}}}{\|{\vec {r_{1}}}\|^{2}}}-{\frac {\vec {r_{2}}}{\|{\vec {r_{2}}}\|^{2}}}\right\|$ $d({\vec {r_{1}}},{\vec {r_{2}}})=\left\|{\frac {\vec {r_{1}}}{\|{\vec {r_{1}}}\|^{2}}}-{\frac {\vec {r_{2}}}{\|{\vec {r_{2}}}\|^{2}}}\right\|$ , assuming a Cartesian coordinate system with an origin in the center of the sphere. Giving a rigorous proof, however, is beyond my meager math skills. - LucidFox (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, disregard this comment. As Wikipedia helpfully points out, the "concave hollow Earth" space is derived from regular Euclidean space by the transformation $r\rightarrow {\frac {R^{2}}{r}}$ in spherical coordinates, where $R$ is Earth's radius. - LucidFox (talk) 06:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Some lizardfolk love for Teed[edit]

From the David Icke Forums:

IMO, the moon is a concave projection, like a bowl (the bowl theory is thanks to another member of the forum, whose name I forget). According to Cyrus Tweed, this is because the moon is a projection of the crust of the earth. I don't know about the latter being true, but the first two conjectures have evidence to support them.

In the same post, this guy claims that the Sun is a "man-made machine" shaped like an "octagonal double pyramid". Oh, and the Earth is a computer, and we live on its inner surface, massaraksh.--ZooGuard (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Even today[edit]

Really, this guy arguing with nephy is great, i had a fun time hearing this and living through it with out reality ending

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=532b5G_Ld2k ^{— Unsigned, by: 71.234.88.83 / talk / contribs} 20:53, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Digging on a cellular cosmogony[edit]

This thing is nutty, but for a fantasy world is pretty cool. Have been any words on what would happen if you digged deeper and deeper on that world? (ie: beginning in but ending on New Zealand) --Panzerfaust (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

You're a bunch of freaks[edit]

I'll not spoil it for those who arrive to this article for the first time, but thanks for the laughs I had when I discovered what means "Massaraksh".

And I'll repeat again: sure this is woo of the finest quality but it's a quite neat idea for a fantasy novel. I guess the world would wrap around and be self-contained; you for example dig on Italy and end up on New Zealand. I'll think deeper on this ~~bullshit~~ cosmology model. --Panzerfaust (talk) 10:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

If only...[edit]

… more 'groups supporting offbeat ideas' added to the sum of human happiness by enabling the creation of parks etc. Anna Livia (talk) 10:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)