Information icon.svg Voting is completed for the RationalWiki 2021 Moderator Election and the results are now posted.
Congratulations to the winners!


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon conspiracy.svg

This Conspiracy theories related article has been awarded SILVER status for quality. We like it, and you should too! See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Editorial notes

This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: <1>

Prime candidate for future Gold[edit]

If there's a missional bronze article out there that deserves to be worked-through and eventually golded, it's got to be this one. We have the material, the sources, the hits, etc... We just need to make the article less bad. Longer and better. Just saying, people. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:42, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

I've given it another pass through. More people's input would be helpful. Bongolian (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Aiming for Gold[edit]

The topic of chemtrails is highly missional. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 18:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Dealing with Chemtrails evangelists.[edit]

I've found that saying that Chemtrails are totally real and composed of Dihydrogen Monoxide, Hydrogen Hydroxide and Hydric Acid tends to keep them busy for a while. - Immigrant laborer (talk) 17:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Enough of the stupid water term hoax, its as stale as old bread.--Rimuru TempestRimuru Slime.png 17:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Should one mention these or would it only alarm them further? Anna Livia (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Geoengineering Watch[edit]

I think this site needs to be addressed. Its founder, Dane Wigington, is one of the leading chemtrail "activists" and seems to be considered the font of all wisdom by chemtrailers. He is on the "chemtrails are secret [geo-engineering] side and is resistant to all facts. (talk) 21:29, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Fount rather than font. Anna Livia (talk) 21:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Ship Tracks[edit]

It might be worth noting that Chemtrail proponents don't seem to be aware of the ship-based analogue to chemtrails xD

It's almost as if combustion products contain that most stalwart of chemical foes: water. — Unsigned, by: Cprobertson1 / talk / contribs

The real chemtrails[edit]

Come out of car exhaust pipes. Anna Livia (talk) 15:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Another plane dispersed not-chemtrail[edit]

This stuff. Anna Livia (talk) 17:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


Has anyone tried linking chemtrails and coronavirus? Anna Livia (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes.[1] Bongolian (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
It is the people inside the plane not the exhaust being the vectors. Anna Livia (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Shouldn't any rational discussion of chemtrails mention John Brennan's discussion of Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) at the council of foreign relations speech which can we widely found with any simple google search? Chemtrails are real as admitted by this speech, but it's called SAI and it's intended purpose is to block the sun and reduce global warming. Don't you think it's worth studying whether those chemicals are harmful? There are studies that the rational researcher and can read about pointing to the toxicity of being exposed to nano particles. Also don't any of you rationalist's think we should have a say in whether or not SAI is conducted. — Unsigned, by: 2605:6000:1a11:e743:3827:4fa3:e1c:320d / talk

Brennan is speaking about the as yet hypothetical geo-engineering to reduce global warming.[2] This is already discussed briefly under Chemtrails#Geo-engineering. Bongolian (talk) 01:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)


So how do the original writers of this page explain the literal photos of the phenomena occurring? It seems VERY much like this article was hastily written by someone who absolutely balks at the very idea of "chemtrails". That's not a good standpoint to argue from, as you have obvious overwhelming bias. This article needs serious revision to be kept modern.— Unsigned, by: 2605:6000:57ca:cd00:1ca6:4f6:87ea:228a / talk / contribs

What the fuck are you talking about? Scream!! (talk) 10:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
The article was created in 2008 and has been intermittently revised ever since. Therefore the IP is talking 'a trail of hot wet air.' Anna Livia (talk) 14:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

These guys just record it?[edit]

Why do lots of the conspiracy theorists who believe in chemtrails just post videos of alleged chemtrails on YouTube? If they think that chemtrails are so harmful, why not move to a country or state that they deem safer?Gorilla beringei graueri (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)