Talk:Communpedia

If there are pages on Liberapedia, Anarchopedia, Left Behind Wiki and obscure wiki like Christopedia, there is no reason to delete this article. --Communi ansk (talk) 09:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

They have more than two authors. Presume you are "XXPowerMexicoXx". It's a blog --Scream!! (talk) 09:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

You're XXPowerMexicoXx? Hey, you're the guy who blocked me, you cunt. --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

The wiki has 506 article, Left Behind Wiki has 513 page. And if you argue this wiki is a blog, then all the wikis I mentioned above can be called blogs. If you can keep an article about a wiki with obscure topic like Let Behind, what is the problem with this page? Also it is the only active wiki in the internet solely dedicated to communism. --Communi ansk (talk) 09:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Good. However, we're only interested in the nitty gritty of the site - when it was set up etc, etc. No link spamming to things like South Korean killing fields, ok? That's for your wiki. --PsyGremlinKhuluma! 09:53, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

And as if to prove this article's point, I was banned on Communpedia for insulting their beloved Stalin. They're like a Communist version of Metapedia. --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 18:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Keep.

Its not doing any harm to have an article on another wiki. It is presumably just as batshit crazy as some of the other wikis we feature, and by the looks of recent changes, [1] it is hardly dead or comatose. --Damo^Hi 09:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Agree. Keep Blue (is useful) 10:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

LOLWUT?

They have an article on Painkiller. And no, it's not like those "Christian video game reviews", it looks more like straight-up fancruft. One would expect that they are fans of Red Faction...--ZooGuard (talk) 11:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

OK, so we have an article on "Painkiller". That doesn't mean we are not a serious political encyclopedia, also we are a growing wiki and community. If you delete this, you will have to recreate it sooner or later, once we have reached some 25,000 articles. That's what I believe. --XXPowerMexicoXx (talk) 01:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

...and what are you, exactly? P-Foster (talk) 01:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

{ec} article count isn't part of our inclusion criteria. However, I think you'll fit in fine here, since we do look at politics and economics. And I'm not just being nice because I'm a communist (btw, you could pick a better name! And we've already got marxists.org But hey, a wiki is a solid idea. Get back to me in year).--User:Brxbrx/sig 01:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)