2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Conspiracy theories surrounding the Oslo attacks

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I know, Poe's law and all that, but the AngusT comment reads like something straight from a psrodist manual. Are there more "reliable" (and that term is obviously used very loosely) sources for that claim? ThunderkatzHo! 22:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


I see no reason why this page can't be part of the one about Anders. I also think more emphasis needs to be stressed on the possible mental state of the perpetrator those who think up these conspiracies.Natman (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Disagree. I think it would be more appropriate to have it mentioned and have a link to this page, in a similar way to how the Moon article links to Moon Landing Hoax. Perceptron (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)