Talk:Converging lines of evidence

is this by one of our editors? the byline appears someone else. It's freakin sweet though.-αmεσ (spy) 17:21, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

It is cogent, isn't it. Later on when the main editing is done those of us less word-incline could cobble up some pictures to shoo away that wall of words feeling and to give the kids something to look at while mom is reading.CЯacke® 17:59, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

Good idear. And break it by sec. But is it actually a work by one of our dudes?-αmεσ (spy) 19:04, 25 September 2007 (EDT)

It's been pointed out that this indeed a cut & paste job. We've got the author's name on it, but since the site it comes from says "all rights reserved" at the bottom, we probably shouldn't be reproducing it at all. What do we do? Wéáśéĺóíď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 13:50, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Can we email the site and ask for permission to reproduce it? Then just abide by their decision? Z3ro^talk 13:53, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Marked for deletion. Not actually deleted, to give anyone who cares time to ask for permissions - David Gerard (talk) 11:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Deletion is imminent. Nobody's asked for permissions yet, and we could just add this as a link or reference somewhere else. Lyra § talk 06:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Gone. Source is [1], if someone feels like using it as a reference - David Gerard (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)