There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staffโwe are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:David Graeber
Why is this even here?[edit]
This seems to be a biased bio that reads like a bad essay. In fact, while reading it, one gets the feeling that the subject is writing it in third person. How is this guy even relevant? How is this even close to missional? Why is it that as of the time I am writing this, the article contains 11 paragraphs supported by only 4 citations? In fact, I harbor serious doubts over whether this article, in its current state, ought to stay up.๐๐ฒ๐ช๐ช๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ค๐ฆ๐ ๐ (๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฐ) (๐ฐ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐) 14:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- It does read like a puff piece, doesn't it? Avida Dollarsher again 17:15, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
- It really does.๐๐ฒ๐ช๐ช๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ค๐ฆ๐ ๐ (๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฐ) (๐ฐ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐) 17:18, 12 January 2020 (UTC)