There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:ENGAGE
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A bit of snark[edit]
Is this safe to add to the article, or is it "too snarky"?
(Here's a tip, guys; if you want to improve your public image, try not being narcissistic sociopaths or objecting to the concept of human rights.[citation NOT needed])
--Luigifan18 (talk) 06:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- You can't you have a topic ban against adding snark ←§ Reichtangle (talk) 06:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uh… the question is about whether the snark is in the spirit of RationalWiki or if it's too mean. --Luigifan18 (talk) 06:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're not allowed to add it ←§ Reichtangle (talk) 07:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- That just sounds mean and unhelpful. Snark is one of my favorite things about RationalWiki. That said, I understand that snark can go too far and I've gone too far with snark several times in the past, which is why I'm asking about this particular instance. --Luigifan18 (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're not allowed to add it ←§ Reichtangle (talk) 07:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Uh… the question is about whether the snark is in the spirit of RationalWiki or if it's too mean. --Luigifan18 (talk) 06:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)