Should this be added to the creationist category?
- er. Is there any substantial reason to? I can't see how this would be a helpful categorisation for a reader looking up creationists - David Gerard (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
"All information posted on this website is the opinion of the author and is provided for educational purposes only"-Site disclaimer (by "authors" they could mean the authors who wrote the information presented originally.)
Shouldn this also be in the "Bad Sources" category? A lot of the stuff on the website is... To say the very least, outlandish. I mean just look at this crankerry--WeakMindedSkeptic (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)