Talk:Edward Feser

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Icon christianity.svg

This Christianity related article has been assessed as SIGNIFICANTLY PROBLEMATIC in one or more ways. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Jellybrain.png
This article requires attention for the following reason(s):
  • Pitiful stub. Needs expansion and sources.

What to do about good faith edits that aren't good[edit]

I don't want to revert the guy, but this change by @Maxwell Hse isn't great. It includes lots of quotes and content, and "references" but doesn't stop along the way to make a point, it's dry and factual but not really informative. It also adds categories that don't exist, suggesting that he thinks this is wikipedia, and I'd really like a second pair of eyes on it. Thanks ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 22:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)