Talk:European Union Times

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon internet.svg

This Internet related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


Archives for this talk page: , (new)

BoNs refuse to comment on talk pages, film at 11[edit]

This gist of this entire section is untrue. I just browsed through the headlines, and every single one of them was based on European news. Furthermore, I believe that news relating to The US greatly affects Europe. For instance, do you honestly believe that Greece could have been bailed out, were the central bank in the US not to have bailed out Europe?

Liberals should be more rational... — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

Language and Credibility[edit]

I was told to look at this site to prove that a news site had no credibility. But upon seeing the language used in this page I was instantly turned off. I found the use of "teabag" to be damaging to the credibility of the site as a whole. My friend convinced me to change the page and give this site another chance. I find foul language to also damage the credibility of a site that purports to be rational, logical, and analytical. — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs

Thank you for your kind words! We appreciate when people take the time to enjoy our articles.Green mowse.pngGodot Chúc mừng năm mới 06:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Drink!! Ochotonaprincepsnot a pokémon 07:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Southern Poverty Law Center Report[edit]

Which is already in the references ;-) - David Gerard (talk) 13:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Possible host for Malware via Drive By[edit]

I have reported to the site that SOPHOS had blocked one of the ads on the page due to MAL/HTML-A infection. I was so glad to be on the receiving end of abuse, and being called retarded. Clearly an unprofessional outfit who have no regard for their visitors. So just another reason to steer clear of this site.— Unsigned, by: Hogmansden / talk / contribs 10:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC) --Hogmansden (talk) 13:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Bizarre Classification[edit]

What the flatulence is a "Libertarian Tea Party"? — Unsigned, by: / talk 19:30, 10 June 2015‎

What some Tea Partyers claim to be, much to the chagrin of (other?) libertarians. ScepticWombat (talk) 20:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)