Talk:Face on Mars/Archive1
Funny[edit]
Funny, I've always heard it named the "Infinite Number of Monkeys", rather than what you've got there. Same thing, I suppose. --Kels 10:43, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
Can someone put pictures up, like one of the face, and one of the face under an angle that shows what it really is? Because that would really help this article. MiddleMan 12:54, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- There's an overall picture at Cydonia Mensae, but I can work on finding specific face ones. Is google image search a viable way of doing it? Thunderkatz 12:56, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- Well there maybe copyright issues with google image, try media commons first. tmtoulouse provoke 12:57, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- Can I just list the source (url, original photo taker) and use it? Thunderkatz 13:02, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- Depends, Wikimedia commons though is always a safe bet like here. tmtoulouse provoke 13:04, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- One (hopefully) final question, then. Do I have to download it then upload it to rationalwiki, or is there an image tag for images offsite? Thunderkatz 13:14, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- Please download and upload here, offsite linking can be problematic for various reasons....I am not sure the software supports it, and its stealing bandwidth from others :). tmtoulouse provoke 13:18, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- One (hopefully) final question, then. Do I have to download it then upload it to rationalwiki, or is there an image tag for images offsite? Thunderkatz 13:14, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- Depends, Wikimedia commons though is always a safe bet like here. tmtoulouse provoke 13:04, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- Can I just list the source (url, original photo taker) and use it? Thunderkatz 13:02, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
- Well there maybe copyright issues with google image, try media commons first. tmtoulouse provoke 12:57, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
New "face" discovered[edit]
A new face was discovered. According to Wikipedia, it appears like a face even in varying sunlight conditions and perspective you're looking at it from. While I personally think it's still a load of bullshit, conspiracy theorists will obviously spit people like us in their faces and say "HA! You can't touch this!" Someone should investigate and eventually debunk it (unless it really is a deliberately made landmark, which is very doubtful). Loc (talk) 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)