There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Fundy loon
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Does there even need to be a page about this? The only thing that needs elucidating would be "fundy," as short for fundamentalist. Otherwise, it's not a particularly distinctive term.--"Shut up, Brx." 01:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- I have to agree — this really is a pointless article. Sam Tally-ho! 03:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- It needs to be put in context. Back in 2007 we were just kicking against the pricks; we've expanded and changed since then (although some might like us to go back to those days). Like anyone who grows up, at some point we have to throw out our childhood toys.
ГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member
09:56, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, redirect to fundamentalism. The term is redundant. Secret Squirrel (talk) 10:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- It needs to be put in context. Back in 2007 we were just kicking against the pricks; we've expanded and changed since then (although some might like us to go back to those days). Like anyone who grows up, at some point we have to throw out our childhood toys.