RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3500Goal: $3500

Talk:Georgia Guidestones

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

The previous information on Van Smith was incorrect. He is from Arkansas (see the linked CNN article) and is a computer expert (see the original source material on his site).— Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 18:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

New 2014 block?[edit]

Depending where I go, I hear something about a 2014 block added to the guidestones, or I hear about it being removed. Does anyone know about this? Also, here's the video with the block.


--Tsunadi (talk) 08:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


Why don't those who find the statements on the stones objectionable (and there is a case for laws 5, 8, 9, and 10 and some components of the others) create their own equivalents? Anna Livia (talk) 15:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Three words: Ten Commandments monuments. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Why not be more imaginative?
What would the RW/Wikiverse equivalents be?
RW No. 1 -some equivalent of 'speak softly but carry a big stick' - involving snark. Anna Livia (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)