There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
The previous information on Van Smith was incorrect. He is from Arkansas (see the linked CNN article) and is a computer expert (see the original source material on his site).— Unsigned, by: 220.127.116.11 / talk / contribs 18:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
New 2014 block?
Depending where I go, I hear something about a 2014 block added to the guidestones, or I hear about it being removed. Does anyone know about this? Also, here's the video with the block.
Why don't those who find the statements on the stones objectionable (and there is a case for laws 5, 8, 9, and 10 and some components of the others) create their own equivalents? Anna Livia (talk) 15:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)