|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:Ginger Taylor
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. |
Missionality?[edit]
Is this person somehow notable, or is this article yet another piece of social pornography about a some kind of whacky nobody? --2001:14BA:27F7:BB00:745F:58A4:D0D2:4289 (talk) 14:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- The article says that she is (or was) the executive director of Canary Party, and maintains a personal blog about autism and "vaccine-choice" activism. Given this, it would appear that she technically falls under point 1 of the mission: "Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement". Rabbitseatcarrots (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm, it seems that the party could be somewhat notable. Maybe $SOMEONE could write an article about it, and then this article could maybe merged to it? --2001:14BA:27F7:BB00:745F:58A4:D0D2:4289 (talk) 15:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. Given that she isn't anymore a member of Canary Party, her relevance is questionable and any arguments that she could have are probably already addressed in other pages, I think a merge is not warranted, instead we should delete this article and write one about the Canary Party instead. Rabbitseatcarrots (talk) 15:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- I rescind my previous statement. It appears that Taylor's blog posts were distributed by Age of Autism on Twitter from 2009 to 2020, acting as a sort of news site. This added to her former position as executive director of Canary Party and appearance in relevant anti-vaccine events makes her relevant in my opinion. The problem with this article is that it looks unfinished, so I support either keeping this article and expanding it or merging it in a future Canary Party article. Rabbitseatcarrots (talk) 15:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. Given that she isn't anymore a member of Canary Party, her relevance is questionable and any arguments that she could have are probably already addressed in other pages, I think a merge is not warranted, instead we should delete this article and write one about the Canary Party instead. Rabbitseatcarrots (talk) 15:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm, it seems that the party could be somewhat notable. Maybe $SOMEONE could write an article about it, and then this article could maybe merged to it? --2001:14BA:27F7:BB00:745F:58A4:D0D2:4289 (talk) 15:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)