Hey guys, I researched the bit under "it's against God's law" about eating four-legged animals, and nothing like that is in Leviticus 17. A nearby chapter, Leviticus 11, does say "You are not to eat any creature that moves along the ground, whether it moves on its belly or walks on all fours or on many feet; it is unclean." I think it's talking about things like alligators, which either drag themselves along or otherwise move very low to the ground, rather than cows and such. I'd change the article myself but you'd probably do a better job of integrating this with the existing arguments. — Unsigned, by: 184.108.40.206 / talk / contribs
"The law of fatherhood is not applicable to same-sex couples"
Shouldn't same-sex couples have right of adoption [child]?220.127.116.11 (talk) 03:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Eclectic Eccentric Spammer No.1
I removed a very obvious plug for Islam stating that homophobia in Africa is "mostly a sub-saharan (I.E. it's not Islamic, it's Christian) phenomenon." Who are the vile people who put these pro-Islamic plugs on these pages? The Muslim Brotherhood must have people working around the clock just editing wikis all over the internet - or maybe 90% of fellow liberals are just so blinded by your dogmatic allegiance to politically correct nonsense that you're incapable of thinking in the slightest, I don't know. 95% of Egypt hates homosexuality. Libya punishes any gay act by 5 years in jail. Algeria it's 2 years in prison - if you're not honor killed by someone for it. In Sudan, the third offense of Sodomy carries the death penalty or life in prison. I don't know who the PC police are around here, but when Islamists are vandalizing your page - better watch out.
Add an article about
József Szájer and why he resignated from being a politican (Homophobe caught on gay orgy). — Unsigned, by: 18.104.22.168 / talk
Help needed on Reddit
Hey, I'm in an argument with a bunch of diehard homophobes on r/antitheistcheesecake, and I could seriously use some backup… --Luigifan18 (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Honestly, I think you can spend your limited time per day more productively than jumping into a "somebody's wrong on the Internet" argument, especially in a community that's explicitly dedicated to mocking people — and especially, from a quick glance at that argument, seeing how these people seem more interested in ad hominem attacks than rational debate. RationalWiki is a wiki, dedicated to compiling knowledge; it's not your personal army. - Linneris (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2022 (UTC)