There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Igon Value Problem
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hey whut up
- Oh, nothing, just googling this term
Oh yeah? hey you know Wikipedia doesn't have this?
- yeah they suck I guess
Where's RW's article on google?
- Like the first page, number eight. it's pretty good
yeah
- yeah--
talk
07:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- This is a good article. Informative and well written.--User:Brxbrx/sig 23:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed. I'm disappointed to see Malcolm Gladwell making this kind of mistake, though. I thought he was better than that.
- I have personal experience with this. I was talking to my counselor about something I was working on in group theory, and she asked whether that had any applications to the psychology of group dynamics. I haven't studied psychology, admittedly, but I would be shocked if they had anything more in common than the word "group." Wehpudicabok (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- This awakens painful recent memories of someone claiming that Principle Component Analysis is used to identify races while exclaiming that "eigenvector" is just a big word meant to impress... Nullahnung (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- "Eigenvector" is totally that.
Don't click here 09:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Good point. Nullahnung (talk) 10:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- "Eigenvector" is totally that.
- This awakens painful recent memories of someone claiming that Principle Component Analysis is used to identify races while exclaiming that "eigenvector" is just a big word meant to impress... Nullahnung (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- I have personal experience with this. I was talking to my counselor about something I was working on in group theory, and she asked whether that had any applications to the psychology of group dynamics. I haven't studied psychology, admittedly, but I would be shocked if they had anything more in common than the word "group." Wehpudicabok (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Computers[edit]
... especially auto-correct and 'automated subtitling programs' have a high IVP figure. Anna Livia (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)