Information icon.svg The election booth for the RationalWiki 2019 Moderator Election is now open. Cast your votes today!

Talk:Igon Value Problem

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon media.svg

This Media related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png

Hey whut up

Oh, nothing, just googling this term

Oh yeah? hey you know Wikipedia doesn't have this?

yeah they suck I guess

Where's RW's article on google?

Like the first page, number eight. it's pretty good

yeah

yeah--ADtalkModerator 07:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Funniest talk page comment evah. ħumanUser talk:Human 07:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
I am awesome.--ADtalkModerator 22:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
This is a good article. Informative and well written.--"Shut up, Brx." 23:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Indeed. I'm disappointed to see Malcolm Gladwell making this kind of mistake, though. I thought he was better than that.
I have personal experience with this. I was talking to my counselor about something I was working on in group theory, and she asked whether that had any applications to the psychology of group dynamics. I haven't studied psychology, admittedly, but I would be shocked if they had anything more in common than the word "group." Wehpudicabok (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
This awakens painful recent memories of someone claiming that Principle Component Analysis is used to identify races while exclaiming that "eigenvector" is just a big word meant to impress... Nullahnung (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
"Eigenvector" is totally that. Scarlet A.pngDon't click here 09:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Good point. Nullahnung (talk) 10:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Computers[edit]

... especially auto-correct and 'automated subtitling programs' have a high IVP figure. Anna Livia (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)