There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Informal fallacy
Attribution[edit]
Some content from http://evolutionwiki.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_Soundness oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 20:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Circumstantial fallacy versus Bulverism[edit]
Lemme say straight up that I'm not gonna bother restoring all of my ref notes that got removed in my absence (I think a lot of them were wall-of-texty or otherwise not that good), but the one I made here ought to stay. It was made to compare and contrast the circumstantial informal fallacy with Bulverism, which is similar enough that they could potentially get confused, but a distinct fallacy nonetheless (distinct enough that we gave it its own page). --Luigifan18 (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Dixiecrat fallacy[edit]
This should probably be absorbed into another page; it doesn't blend well with the main page for informal fallacies as it doesn't have a "list of fallacies not major enough to get their own page" section. PLMMJ (talk) 08:18, 25 December 2024 (UTC)