Talk:John F. Kennedy's commencement address at American University

I have no problems with it in and of itself. Researcher 21:57, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Interesting thing to have around, yes. human 16:09, 23 December 2007 (EST)

Ouch, that just got hard to read. Hey Edge, how about instead of shrinking all the "normal" text, make the bold stuff "bigger"? (you could swap <small> for </big> and vice versa in a text editor?)human 21:28, 23 December 2007 (EST)

I agree, had to take Firefox up two + to read it! --TK_/MyTalk 21:39, 23 December 2007 (EST)

I ran it through a biggermaker. I like the "big" emphasized text better anyway, it jumps out more. human 21:47, 23 December 2007 (EST)

Thank you! old(er) eyes everywhere are grateful... --TK_/MyTalk 22:28, 23 December 2007 (EST)

No prob. Nice snowman, by the way. Mine never bounce like that! human 23:17, 23 December 2007 (EST)

Helium ;-)

Hahahaha... BOING!

Thanks...

...to everyone for making the fixes to this.

I've had some mixed feelings about this article. In some ways I felt that I was just providing my own mined quotes. However, I figured that between providing the entire text and the editorial notes, that anyone could take what I emphasized as face value or see the original context for themselves. --Edgerunner⁷⁶ 07:59, 3 January 2008 (EST)

It always made sense to me - JFK was such a good speecher, it's usually worth reading the whole thing anyway. And RW does like to do that "100% context" thing, whether critiquing or commenting (like with our Behe interview rebuttal thing, or several critiques of CP articles/essays). Oh, and you're welcome for whatever fixes I participated in. human 17:17, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Yet another mainspace subpage

This is one of those pages that doesn't have a namespace in which to belong. It can't go in mainspace as it is, because there are no subpages in mainspace (that's a fact!).

Not changing our current system of organization, our possible solutions include moving to a subpage of the user who wrote it and deletion. Alternatively we could reopen the discussion on a new catch-all namespace for content we want to host but doesn't exactly fit our mission statement or the limitations of the MediaWiki main namespace. Blue (pester) 00:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Why don't we have subpages in the mainspace? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 21:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

For one, 9/11 becomes a subpage of 9. Peter^{Quasniki 2012!} 21:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)