Talk:Keith Olbermann
What is up with this website??? The Fox News page has snarky editorialism all over the place yet the left wing-related pages read like a proper Wikipedia article, only with bad grammar and editing. — Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs
- Thank you for your contribution. P-Foster Talk "Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing." 01:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
I came here pleased that some right wing people were being skewered and lampooned yet all of the left-wing people are treated affectionally....that's if they're mocked at all. It just looks amateur. — Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs
- Keith olberman, cannot nor has he ever done anythign wrong at all. he is a saint. nay, a God. GodotGrow a vagina 02:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm just commenting on your editors. This site seems like conservapedia for the left. That's fine. Just be honest about it.— Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs
Umad? No reason to pull the internet tough guy card. I haven't been convinced by anybody, especially you of all people, why I should edit articles on here and this is obviously a deceptive website. Like if CP called themselves rational wiki. Zero difference between the two.— Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs
- "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink! and "JUST LIKE CP" double shot! TyAnnoy 02:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Whiny bitch it is, then. Thanks for coming. P-Foster Talk "Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing." 02:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)