Information icon.svg Nominations and campaigning for the RationalWiki 2019 Moderator Election is underway and will end on November 16.

Talk:Keith Olbermann

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

What is up with this website??? The Fox News page has snarky editorialism all over the place yet the left wing-related pages read like a proper Wikipedia article, only with bad grammar and editing. — Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs

Thank you for your contribution. P-Foster Talk "Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing." 01:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I came here pleased that some right wing people were being skewered and lampooned yet all of the left-wing people are treated affectionally....that's if they're mocked at all. It just looks amateur. — Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs

Keith olberman, cannot nor has he ever done anythign wrong at all. he is a saint. nay, a God. Pink mowse.pngGodotGrow a vagina 02:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
We are not uncyclopedia. TyAnnoy 02:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Nobody is stopping you from editing. Shit or get off the pot. P-Foster Talk "Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing." 02:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm just commenting on your editors. This site seems like conservapedia for the left. That's fine. Just be honest about it.— Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs

....or you could stop being a whiny bitch and edit the article. That's fine too. P-Foster Talk "Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing." 02:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Umad? No reason to pull the internet tough guy card. I haven't been convinced by anybody, especially you of all people, why I should edit articles on here and this is obviously a deceptive website. Like if CP called themselves rational wiki. Zero difference between the two.— Unsigned, by: 166.248.32.112 / talk / contribs

"But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink! and "JUST LIKE CP" double shot! TyAnnoy 02:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Whiny bitch it is, then. Thanks for coming. P-Foster Talk "Watched Mad Men thinking it was supposed to be a sit-com. Found it disappointing." 02:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)