2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Cellular cosmogony

From RationalWiki
(Redirected from Talk:Koreshanity)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon pseudoastronomy.svg

This Pseudoastronomy related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

Metrics[edit]

Interesting idea, though is that worth expanding on in a section rather than a footnote? ADK...I'll edit your gas tank! 19:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Well, I don't know. It was just a fun observation. All I can say is that I think the required metric would be , assuming a Cartesian coordinate system with an origin in the center of the sphere. Giving a rigorous proof, however, is beyond my meager math skills. - LucidFox (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
    • Actually, disregard this comment. As Wikipedia helpfully points out, the "concave hollow Earth" space is derived from regular Euclidean space by the transformation in spherical coordinates, where is Earth's radius. - LucidFox (talk) 06:24, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Some lizardfolk love for Teed[edit]

From the David Icke Forums:

IMO, the moon is a concave projection, like a bowl (the bowl theory is thanks to another member of the forum, whose name I forget). According to Cyrus Tweed, this is because the moon is a projection of the crust of the earth. I don't know about the latter being true, but the first two conjectures have evidence to support them.

In the same post, this guy claims that the Sun is a "man-made machine" shaped like an "octagonal double pyramid". Oh, and the Earth is a computer, and we live on its inner surface, massaraksh.--ZooGuard (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Even today[edit]

Really, this guy arguing with nephy is great, i had a fun time hearing this and living through it with out reality ending

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=532b5G_Ld2k — Unsigned, by: 71.234.88.83 / talk / contribs 20:53, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Digging on a cellular cosmogony[edit]

This thing is nutty, but for a fantasy world is pretty cool. Have been any words on what would happen if you digged deeper and deeper on that world? (ie: beginning in but ending on New Zealand) --Panzerfaust (talk) 12:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

You're a bunch of freaks[edit]

I'll not spoil it for those who arrive to this article for the first time, but thanks for the laughs I had when I discovered what means "Massaraksh".

And I'll repeat again: sure this is woo of the finest quality but it's a quite neat idea for a fantasy novel. I guess the world would wrap around and be self-contained; you for example dig on Italy and end up on New Zealand. I'll think deeper on this bullshit cosmology model. --Panzerfaust (talk) 10:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

If only...[edit]

… more 'groups supporting offbeat ideas' added to the sum of human happiness by enabling the creation of parks etc. Anna Livia (talk) 10:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)