Talk:Laurence Fox

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon politics.svg

This Politics related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Radicalization[edit]

it look like a biog to me. if its a joke i dont get it AMassiveGay (talk) 10:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

also hes a fucking awful singer AMassiveGay (talk) 10:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Well it was supposed to be a joke in view of the total lack of radicalization. But obviously if it's not funny it can be deleted. --Annanoon (talk) 12:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Forces behind Reclaim party[edit]

I've read claims about who's behind the Reclaim party, but not much hard info from good sources. Reportedly it's being managed by PR company Reputation Management and its boss Patrick Barrow who has links with the Conservative Party and Daily Telegraph.[1] I'd like to see better sources before putting it in the article though. --Annanoon (talk) 12:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

paedos[edit]

its unfortunate for fox that hes being sued in the uk (i assume its the uk, dont always know where things play out when they start on twitter). if it were the US elon musk has already established you are allowed to libel people as paedophiles.

if you cant call someone a paedo with zero evidence, what does it say about free speech in the uk? i was concerned when these internet stasi types started calling out racism, insinuating that those tweeting racist bullshit might be racist, but i felt sure the people would not stand such bolshie liberties, but the rot has truly set in if this web based gestapo can us the courts in such an unbritish fashion. my grand father did not fight the nazis just to see an old harrovian in the dock. thats a subversion of brtish justice and an assault on the very fabric of society.

racism is what commoners do. you cannot be a racist if you are wearing an old school tie. people should strive to know their place and not question ther betters. who is better placed than a public school boy to say who is or isnt a paedophile, i ask you? honestly if these oiks had learned a proper trade at their comprehensives instead of all this politically correct nonsense, there would be whole lot less of these uppity homosexuals about the place getting ideas above their station. what can these people know of the world without a classical education and never having fagged for anyone with breeding? and what would be of the country now, if johnson had not been to eton? john major only went to mere grammar, and we got over a decade of labour as a result.

Fox is surely a martyr for our times. AMassiveGay (talk) 13:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

harrow and rada[edit]

seriously, he went to harrow. surely something should be said about a guy complaining of 'allegations' of his privilege went to a school that is up there with eton as a school that educates the ruling class on how to rule. 7 british prime ministers (churchill went there), dozens of foreign leaders, and no less than 5 kings. wikipedia has a list of 'some' notable alumni, and its fucking huge and not exhaustive. Fox is almost a serf in comparison, but still very posh, not landed gentry, but scion of a theatrical dynasty going back over a century.

hes also claimed harrow threatened to sue him for talking about its racism, homopobia, and the bullying that went on there. cant find anything that elaborates on that, maybe the telgraph, but it was paywalled.

and the RADA is hardy a bastion inclusivity with its current director saying in july '"RADA has been and currently is institutionally racist".

not for this page, but we can probably do with page on british public schools. eton alone has provided 20 prime ministers and we cant even begin to understand some of these fucknuts without understanding the schools that instil the idea they are born to rule and the lock on power these places have. it explains the hubris of cameron and brexit, and it explains the absolutely vacuity of johnsons ambition of the premiership and his complete absence of direction or any kind of plan for it once he got there. it explains fox too. AMassiveGay (talk) 15:45, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Musical Career censorship[edit]

He claims to have been censored from releasing a song called "MeToo" by his music label and that this is exactly the sort of problem with cancel culture. He is the sole director of his music label.

I agree that this is the perfect example of cancel culture.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/laurence-fox-interview-let-the-hipsters-hate-me-i-wont-dance-to-their-politically-correct-tune-5d7tdgwz7


Whats funny is he owns his record label AMassiveGay (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

his campaign...[edit]

...doing really shit. joint last with peter gammons (real name and no hint of irony) of ukip. probably not helped by his promise to 'open up london' as london opens up. even brian for mayor is doing better and hes a god awful prick. in fact brian for mayor, fox, and the ukip gammon named gammons (the gammon is really called gammons) are being beaten by count binface and a random youtuber whos only in it for a lark.AMassiveGay (talk) 11:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

'the gammon gammons' makes me laugh. AMassiveGay (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

unmitigated failure[edit]

i cant stress enough how much a disastrous failure his candidacy was. he was probably never expecting victory, but he probably thought he'd have some impact, maybe influence the agenda somehow, or at least show has not insignificant support. but nope. nothing. considering the cash he spent for zero impact. campaigning for lifting lockdown (just as it was starting to be lifted), being against 'wokeness' vague and meaningless was somehow a policy. and at the last minute, a prole must have suggested it him, get rid or dial back the congestion charge. for someone bitching about called privileged (i honestly think he's pissed off because he hadnt realised he was privileged. he was expelled in 6form of harrow. he thought was a maverick man of the people rebelling against the system) but everything about his candidacy, was the result of his privilege. hes not the voice of the people like he imagines, hes got nothing to say and no popular support. that anyone gave him the time of day was because of who is AMassiveGay (talk) 10:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC)