There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Loch Ness Monster
Surgeon's photo[edit]
We should use the uncropped version as that shows the hoaxiness of it more clearly. Totnesmartin 17:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
St Columba[edit]
The stories of St Columba and the monster are quite funny, and as historically important as anything here. Annquin (talk) 12:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Nessie and the dinosaurs[edit]
Some mention of the latest claim - [1] and other newspapers of variable repute - should be made. Anna Livia (talk) 18:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Remember folks[edit]
that all pictures of Nessie are faked, excepting the ones where he (and he's always a he) is wearing a Tam o' shanter. Scherben (talk) 21:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Big problem[edit]
I was looking through, when I found an article on Science Alert disproving a new Nessie photo. I found the Syracuse, Forbes and Daily Mail posted on it, wrongly. When I was making an edit to put in the articles, I acidentally hit <ref> instead of </ ref>. I've gotten rid of it, but the error message is still there. Can anyone help? — Unsigned, by: Boredsocialist / talk / contribs