From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon evolution.svg

This Evolution related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


"Creationist wiki that gives a full explanation of the lungfish and why it is not transitional" Nice one! Him (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

That was[edit]

The best creationist explanation of the lungfish I could find.--Thedoctor80 (talk) 17:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Minor edit dilemma[edit]

"Lungfish are living fossils, similar in form to previous sarcoptergiian fish from the Devonian period onward (with most sarcoptergiians are long extinct). emphasis added

This seems to me like it should be either

with most sarcoptergiians being long extinct


most sarcoptergiians are long extinct

but which is best? Fonzie (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

The latter, for aesthetic reasons. It's more parenthetical-sounding which fits its placement. MarmotHead (talk) 18:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Done. But on the other hand what about making it less parenthetical-sounding and removing the parentheses? Fonzie (talk) 13:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
No need to post on talk for minor Grammatical/English changes. Just edit it - if it's really out of line it'll get reverted. Scream!! (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

A question[edit]

should we go more in depth with the distinct species?

I think it would better to have a page as detailed and lengthy as possible to debunk creationism151.160.7.53 (talk) 15:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)