There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Nebraska Man
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hitchings - My source describes Hitching's book as creationist:
- Talk origin - "Hitching's book spends much of its time attacking Darwinian evolution, borrowing heavily and uncritically from young-earth creationist arguments."
- Answers in Genesis - doesn't like Hitching's rejection of scripture, but applauds his anti-Darwinism. VOXHUMANA 11:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Francis Hitching is not a creationist (I have his book), he rejects the Darwinian theory of evolution you are correct, but not the fact of evolution. Perhaps you should look at Non-Darwinian evolution. I am not saying Hitching's views are mainstream. Dawkins and Gould criticised his book, but it would be wrong to classify him as a creationist. Forests (talk) 13:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)