Talk:Not even wrong
Conservapedia[edit]
I move to merge this page with conservapedia's "science" articles
Another version[edit]
From 'the usual obscure source': some speaker at a conference to the translator: 'Why are you not translating my words?' Answer 'You are not only wrong, you are boring.' Anna Livia (talk) 10:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
An earlier reference[edit]
While the article refers to Wolfgang Pauli as the likely originator of the concept, I believe this earlier reference by Charles Anders Peirce demonstrates that the concept was being articulated by philosophers a century earlier:
"Many a man has cherished for years as his hobby some vague shadow of an idea, too meaningless to be positively false; he has, nevertheless, passionately loved it, has made it his companion by day and by night, and has given to it his strength and his life, leaving all other occupations for its sake, and in short has lived with it and for it, until it has become, as it were, flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone; and then he has waked up some bright morning to find it gone, clean vanished away like the beautiful Melusina of the fable, and the essence of his life gone with it. I have myself known such a man; and who can tell how many histories of circle-squarers, metaphysicians, astrologers, and what not, may not be told in the old German story?"
E = mc2 + AI[edit]
It seems to me that another good example is LinkedIn user named Sreekanth Kumbha suggesting as a new equation to account for AI significance according to this Tumblr post and numerous Reddit reposts; I can't verify it because LinkedIn seems to only show comments to authorized users and I don't have an account. Should that be added in Not even wrong#Examples?
Caralice (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Terrence Howard[edit]
Does he count here? — Unsigned, by: Qwertydiy / talk / contribs