There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Old Believers
This article requires additional citations or verification--"Shut up, Brx." 01:08, 20 November 2012 (UT
Topic[edit]
This article is incredibly oversimplified. They took a complex schism that was the result of a variety of factors and ideas that were floating around Russia at the time and simplified it considerably to push an agenda. This is not proper objective religious studies research, you author knew other factors were involved but proceeded to not mention any of them. - HushYourGumms, I don't know how to edit wikis properly but I thought I would write this so we get a more nuanced article. — Unsigned, by: HushYourGumms / talk / contribs
- Does this merit a RW Drinking Game drink?
- HYG - do not confuse this page with [1] (which may be a suitable external link). Anna Livia (talk) 13:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)