There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:One Angry Gamer
Goat help me[edit]
I had to read through about 30 articles from One Angry Gamer to make this article. While it's an eye-opening reminder of what I may embody if I'd continued being a gamergator, It was also one of the most depressing ways I have ever spent several hours of my life. I hope this article was worth it. -Aspieduck
- Huh seems like they still haven't grown out of their Get Rid of Slimy Girls phase. --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 02:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- It was worth it; thanks for your time, and sorry you had to pollute your brain. 156.146.34.1 (talk) 20:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Bias[edit]
This article seems to be very biased. 68.15.30.29 (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- In what form. Every claim we have is well sourced. We're not required to provide balance when there is none. OAG to my knowledge has never missed a beat when it comes to being a nutjob site. Seriously, Billy can blame the smallest amount of region changes on "the evil SJWs" (rather than sensibility for the place it would be published in). As far as I can see, our article is pretty accurate and maybe even a little light. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! /
/
/
) 22:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)