User:LeftyGreenMario

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
BrainMop.png As a confirmed mustard jar for taking on this job as a Sysop on RationalWiki: I, LeftyGreenMario, pledge to only block users if they ask for it, or insert unfunny vandalism.
I furthermore pledge that if I indulge in secret private conversations about you, we will make a formal report to the mob. Is that all?
If you impugn my motives without warrant, or challenge my "AUTHORITY", er, there is nothing I can or will do.
Sunglasses will not provide an adequate protection from sungazing; this includes protection from sungazers themselves.
If you read all of these userboxes,
then good for you!
Speeeed Loog.gif
This user is a Green Mario but not Green Mario Stylized Amanita muscaria.svg.
M emblem.png
This user plays video games. This user also really, really likes Mario.
Future.gif This user is a moderator.
SJW
This user is a Smooth Jazz Waluigi (but maybe rather a Super Jazzy Mario instead?).
NO.
This user is asexual and has no sex drive whatsoever. Getting laid with Mario is creepy and disgusting.
No doxxing plz.
This user vehemently opposes Gamergate for everything. A female gamer opposing Gamergate, how surprising!
50 States flag.png This user lives in the best damn country on Earth, and you better believe it!
Flag of California.svg
This user lives in the California Republic.
Smg powerstar.jpg
This user pwned Super Mario Galaxy!
Uphere01sm.gif
This user is female.
BrainMop.jpg This user was demoted to janitor Sysop. (verify)
# This user chats on Discord.
hella This user is hella liberal.
Political compass small logo.gif
This user's Political Compass coordinates are (-8.75 ,-8.05).
Atom.jpg
This user thinks that evolution explains the origin of species.
Troll
This user likes a troll-free talk page. Revert away!


Atom.jpg
This user does not believe so called "faith" can contend with modern science.
Icon christianity.svg This user is an atheist but would be fine with a world where Christians were more like Jesus and less like Jerry Falwell.
Gay flag.svg
This user believes in equal rights for gay people.
Glock30.jpg
This user thinks arms should be "well regulated" per the Second Amendment
National Rifle Association logo.png
This user wishes personal firearms were illegal. Some day.
Medicalsign1.png
This user believes
in universal healthcare
GreenPartyUSA.jpg
Despite the user name, this user is not officially affiliated with the Green Party.
dem
This user doesn't care who wins any presidential election, as long as it's not a Republican or anyone that reeks of wingnut or moonbattery.
Graduation-cap.jpg
This user went to a public school, and was never homeschooled.
Usa flag circle.png This user does not read Wackopedia Conservapedia in order to preserve her IQ.
Donald Trump by Gage Skidmore.jpg
This user hates Donald Trump with her guts and the rest of her body and wants to punch him with his shit-eating grin very hard.
Donald Trump This user hates Donald Trump with every fiber of her being and wants to kick him in the shins as hard as she can.
Official Portrait of President Reagan 1981.jpg This user believes there is nothing redeeming about Conservatism.
Stop hand.png
This user would probably be blocked on Conservapedia on account of username alone.
ASchlafly.jpg
This user thinks this guy is really creepy

Not to be confused with little green man though Mario is little, he sometimes wears green, and he is a man.

Welcome to my userpage. No, my username doesn't have any sort of political undertones. I'm left-handed, I play a lot of Mario games, and I use the Green Mario recolor in Super Smash Bros.. That's really all. It's just a big coincidence that I happen to fall on the left side of the political spectrum on pretty much everything, and I'm an environmentalist.

I'm a regular at RationalWiki. I'm not quite sure how I discovered this site, but I think I've looked up an article on logical fallacies. I had a small debate with another user, and the user mentioned Galileo as an assertion that science is wrong. I think the Galileo gambit page provided a nice rebuttal for my argument, but I also found the humor kind of silly. For a while, I became somewhat of a lurker, being a minor I.P. editor who makes small fixes. One day, I figured, hey, what the hell, I'm going to make an account. After all, my beliefs fit with this community. I'm an atheist, I support basically everything to the left in the political spectrum, and I do love a dose of snarky humor.

BabyLuigiOnFire is my identical twin sister, who is superior to me in every way. If you notice any similarities between the two, now you know why.

About me

Just not a tinfoil one. It's not as fashionable.

I'm a 24 year old avid Mario fan who, not surprisingly, plays video games and likes to talk about video games. Mario is my favorite character by far. My second favorite character is Luigi, who is often called "Green Mario". I love Mario and might have an unhealthy obsession with him. Show me a nice picture of Mario and the fangirl in me is going to go nuts. I also like to mod video games, and I've modded Left 4 Dead 2, Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Super Smash Bros. for Wii U, Mario Kart Wii, Mario Kart 8 Grand Theft Auto V, Spore, Garry's Mod. If it's not apparent already, I'm a total Mario nerd and I can nerd out with random Mario trivia and make the occasional Mario reference in my comments.

I was a frequent contributor to MarioWiki, and MarioWiki is actually among my first years of Wiki experience, being there since late 2009. I go by the moniker "Bazooka Mario Stylized Amanita muscaria.svg", so if you want to pop in and say hi over there, feel free. Keep in mind, the community over there is pret-ty liberal and is very pro LGBTQIA+.

My interests include not only gaming, but also birding (I love birds) and drawing. I want to work as a 3D modeler one day. My areas of interest that would be missional in RationalWiki would be vaccines, climate change, general food woo, gun control, immigration (somewhat), ADHD, and I'm not that knowledgeable or that interested about foreign policy, the debate around IQ tests, or economics, so I often cannot contribute a good share on those discussions.

I also care about grammar and syntax but will often politely ignore it, but not always (like self-proclaimed GrammarCommies making "it's" errors or Kings writing random all-caps).

Other traits
  • A cisgender female. I know there are dudes out there that lie (I mean cis dudes who lie that they are girls on the internet, I don't mean trans women at all; trans women are women), and you just have to take my word for it that I'm not one of those dudes.
  • Hapa. French Chinese descent. Due to my descent (probably), I enjoy all sorts of food from hamburgers to brussels sprouts to pie to pig brain to bok choy to pork intestine to spinach to cow tongue to tung ho to sushi to rare/medium rare steak to kimchi to ox tail soup to nachos to octopus to frog legs to brie to ikra to pizza to ratatouille to chicken gizzard to silkworm pupae; and I do have the unpopular opinion that eating cats and dogs in of itself is completely fine. There's no need to cast people (Asians in particular) who eat cats and dogs as "degenerates" or imply they are, and I find it wrong, overblown, racist, misguided, hypocritical that there are efforts to ban eating cats and dogs, but a lot of people try that.
  • Feminist Egalitarianism is just feel good platitude that won't accomplish anything. Men do get disadvantages in some aspects and we should level them but women have far more disadvantages overall and if we need to level the playing field, naturally this means proportionally giving more rights to women especially if they are in a racial minority. Men can have bad vision in the playing field compared to women but women have broken ankles, one arm missing, and twisted backs. We give men glasses, we repair women their serious wounds.
  • Atheist - the Bible is ancient fan fiction with rape (promoting it), foreskins, violence fetish, and furry porno. That people take it seriously, let alone worship it, is, frankly, gut-strain laughable. The other religions are very ridiculous too. Religion isn't compatible with modern society.
  • Asexual aromantic (Quoiromantic type). I find that sex is going to be a huge problem during my life not because I can't have it, but I don't want to have it and that will cause friction for partners, and I don't understand or appreciate what a lack of sex can do to people. I'm actually slightly resenting the idea that people expect sex from a loving relationship. I know sex is a basic function but I don't find it really important or even all that pleasurable. And there's the idea that "being laid" is some signifier of being a decent person, as the label "not being able to get laid" is usually applied to actual assholes like mikemikev; I find it highly upsetting and I do hope attitudes change, and people should stop using "getting laid", as a measure of decency.
  • For LGBTQ rights. Per above, I believe that aces are part of the spectrum (which makes me part of the spectrum). I don't know why social conservatives find this a problem. Social conservatives ARE the problem. I also have the very unpopular opinion that consensual sibling-sibling sexual relationships should not be taboo, and I do think non-offending pedophiles should be listened to.
  • Environmentalist. Nothing scares me more than climate change. While you can overstate its impact, climate changes effects are very bad and will get worse. I limit my meat intake when I can and I like fuel efficient cars.
  • Pro-GMO.
  • For gun regulation. Guns have no place in civilian society outside of maybe target shooting and maybe hunting but I don't like hunting as a "sport" either. Hunting crows absolutely breaks my heart. I don't support outright banning guns, but do support gun ownership through very strict means (and self-defense is not a valid means to own a gun).
  • For government regulation on corporate practices in general.
  • Pro-abortion. I do understand the concerns of the anti-abortion movement. I understand that terminating potential human life is bad but my problem with the anti abortion movement is that they fail to understand the bigger picture. I don't see anything redeeming about the anti abortion position as a movement, aside from the initial good-faith idea of letting fetus survive pregnancy. All they do, however, is help no one, not even the fetus, by restricting women, having fetus be born to a parent that doesn't want it, and disproportionately affecting the lower class. Anti abortion is a classist ideology. I also wouldn't even be here if my mom was forced to carry to term as she had abortions and a miscarriage before having me and my sister. Pro-life does not value quality life. It values birth in the family's worst socio economic conditions or otherwise put babies immediately for adoption, which I find more immoral than abortion. People who avoided abortions and were born shouldn't be killed however, but their parents took a gamble that impacted their life and while these people should try to lead quality lives, there are forced births that I fear leads to a very rough parentless time in adoption and I can't have peace of mind if I had to put my own recent children immediately for adoption.
  • Evolution is a theory. That means it should be taught in school, just like gravity.
  • Have ADHD. All symptoms of it. Psychiatry denial gets me furious. I also am appalled by how the Internet, especially the gaming part, treats autistic people as degenerate. I'm also offended when people trivialize ADHD when they characterize movies with hasty pacing as movies for those kids or when they disparage an unfocused part of a game as "ADHD".
  • Against capital punishment. Doesn't work, horribly expensive through appeals process, cruel, prone to racism, prone to sexism (against men), very classist. Support for it is just vengeance or ignorance of its costs.
  • Against Gamergate.
  • I love eating dead bug soupWikipedia's W.svg, pork intestine, sea urchins, tofu that smells like a rank sewerWikipedia's W.svg, and other inedible food products.
  • Global warming denier
  • Anti-GMO
  • Watches Fox News.
  • Anti-vaccine

In other words, I'm evil by Conservapedia standards.

I also used to be one of the types that used to decry "unnatural", "pesticides", "chemicals" in food would love to buy organic. I did find the idea of "natural" 7-Up to be ridiculous and I don't think high-fructose corn syrup is dangerous, just overapplied. I had distrusted MSG, though, and I was opposed to GMO labeling only because it's useless information (like, labels are already useless enough with bait-and-switch less fat - more sugar type) and not necessarily that GMOs were safe. I don't think I'll be on the level of FoodBabe or Mike Adams, but I would've been the type that would balk at the ingredient list in some foods.

I'm surprised by how many more people than I thought "used" to be one of the right-wing types before re-evaluating themselves.

Fun Mario fax

Spending just a measly hour with this miserable, cancer-of-the-brain-inducing game is like going naked hot-tubbing with Rush Limbaugh as your parents cheer and snap photos. I didn't think it was humanly possible for this series to get any worse than it was, but this entry wailed on my unmentionables until they were well past black and blue.
—Andrew Reiner on Mario Party 2, Game Informer issue #128
All in all, if Mario Party 6 was a real party, it'd be one of those parties where there's nothing to drink but warm Heineken and no one to talk to but people who are having trouble with their boiler and students who've just spent three months in Thailand and want to tell you all about how they got dysentery in Chiang Mai, while a Savage Garden fan hangs round the stereo all night glaring at anyone who tries to suggest an alternative.
Ellie Gibson on Mario Party 6, Eurogamer
Luigi and WWII.jpg
If offended conservative Christians had their way in astronomy sex education.

And Pokémon gets all the attention. Somehow.

Eggsternal Mario-related links for more Mario fax

What I've done so far here

Mario of disappointment.jpg

NOTHING!

I lied.

Not significant enough as a WIGO

These nice folks at GameFAQs lose their shit over "cultural appropriation" when the cover of Super Mario Odyssey gets changed. The alteration? A small, blurry picture of Mario donning a sombrero gets changed to Mario in a swimsuit. The original picture wasn't too great to begin. The cultural appropriation argument doesn't really work. Mario looks like a stereotypical Italian plumber for Goat's sake. I'm sure the same people who lose their shit over this claim to be anti-PC but they're every bit PC as the imaginary Slew Jays are.

Recommended sites

If you're a regular reader, it also pays to read this as this sort of behavior from sea lions in this wiki is a constant annoyance to all involved. I'll cite this when relevant in the future.

Youtubers I like

  • Shaun - left-wing Youtuber that addresses right-wing talking points and Youtubers, goes into their sources, debunks them, has a dry tone
  • Hbomberguy - left-wing Youtuber that does a little what Shaun does, but has more humor and wacky video editing
  • Three Arrows - similar to Shaun, but German I guess
  • Kat Blaque - smaller Youtuber that is a simple video of just the Youtuber talking to a camera, kinda like a podcast, but gets sidelined by algorithms and recommended videos
  • Jim Sterling - really hates the video game industry and informs about the latest underhanded tactics they do

Praise

lefty green mario can jump off a cliff

You will go fuck yourself, you piece of dog shit. Unlike you, I have a life, so being permabanned from 1 website doesn't affect me all that much. Unlike you, I have a spine, so I'm unwilling to bend over and offer my ass whenever I'm mistreated.

if the best argument you have is misrepresenting what I said then you might as well delete this topic. You are a lying cancerous wart of a human being with not a single iota of your beloved "tolerance" if it's of a political position right of center. FUCK You you female reproductive organ. That's the PC way of saying it).

Oh, you [and GrammarCommie] are most definitely Nazis. And invoking Godwin's Law isn't going to help you either because even Godwin agrees that you're Nazis:-https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/godwins-law-mike-godwin-internet-hitler-charlottesville-virginia-donald-trump-a7892171.html

You can deny being part of the alt-Reich if you like (to be honest I would too!!) but the fact is that NOBODY cries and wails about fake censorship except the internet 4Chan Nazis who were kicked off Reddit and migrated to Voat. Your claims that it is "inconsistent with reality" are, like everything else which leaves your bumbling mouth, a complete lie. Remember dummy, you are the one who thinks accusations are de facto true unless proven otherwise, and when they are proven otherwise, you are the one who thinks it is OK to delete said proof. Hence, prove you are not a Nazi or stfu. I'm done being reasonable with you because you're a lying cunt who deleted all my posts, then later cried victim and blocked me for doing the same back to you. You are an intellectually redundant, dishonest scumbag troll.

LOL. It is genuinely amusing watching you parade your near-total ignorance of science as if it were some kind of badge of honour. Harassment of Rational Wiki users is not a form of argument (including flagging me for spam, parading me, blocking me, unilaterally removing my edits from my own talk page and goading me with idiotic rhetoric inside pink admin badges). This is the behaviour of adolescents, not of adults prepared to engage in rational discussion. You represent a complete aberration of everything this website ostensibly stands for. I could literally spend all day illustrating what awe-inspiring idiots you are simply by referencing your own behaviour, but of course the reaction of idiots is never to critically analyse their own behaviour. Rather, the reaction of idiots is always to attack the critic.

The fact of the matter is that your article is precisely the type of pseudo-science this website claims to refute. You are so insurmountably stupid that you think ScrewLooseChange, a blog purporting to "debunk" the Loose Change documentary, is a relevant reference to use to discredit a website which has absolutely nothing to do with the Loose Change documentary. One almost has to gawk in disbelief at the sheer level of incompetence. It's like arguing with 13 year old children who have the power to cut your internet -- frustrating, and ultimately pointless.

You bizarrely claim to be on the political left, yet here you are touting a right wing conspiracy theory, proliferated by the same right wing government which let the attacks happen, and which is contradicted by almost all of the available scientific research. Indeed, most of the fallacies you have been using to attack me have been pulled directly out of the Joseph Goebbels Handbook For Aspiring Nazis, such as mockery absent argument, bullying, distortion and Freudian projection. At this point it is abundantly clear that if you are not wingnuts you are simply idiots with no understanding of Hegelian dialectic. However, I am fairly certain it is the former. The Nazis themselves falsely claimed to be on the left, which I pointed out last night (before you removed that entry too, on top of all the others).

Your article is blatant unscientific rubbish which is supported by literally nothing other than the semantic ramblings of a single deranged cretin who put out a video documentary. And this, in your oh so wise opinion, is sufficient to dehumanise dozens of professional scientists who have risked their careers to produce independent research on 9/11. It is simply beyond pathetic. You might have the power to harass and bully me from the site, sure, but when all is said and done you are still halfwits who think Newton's laws of motion and elementary mechanics are something to be mocked because you saw it on a documentary directed by a notorious liar who has been counter-debunked more times than flat-Earth theory. A simple Google search lists numerous people who have meticulously responded to his bullshit, but like all information which doesn't substantiate your own grossly inaccurate opinion you simply pretend it doesn't exist.

In summary, you are a couple of intellectually retarded edgelords, who are so pathologically butthurt from being called stupid your entire lives, you come to places like this to flaunt the fact that other people now have to put up with it or leave the site. Well congratulations. What overachievers you are. Lol.

Okay Here's why You shouldn't vote for LeftyGreenMario of all nominations. For out of all the accepted Nominations(And many declined nominations) she is in my opinion the most biased. Let's start off with her attitude, his attitude towards all those right of center. He labels those like Ethan Ralph as being on the same level of extreme as Richard Spencer (Or Heaven forbid TRUMP /S)
Let us compare him to another candidate for instance User:LeftyGreenMario has a total of two badges displaying her bias against Trump Compensating for something. One against conservatism as well because as we all know Progress is always good and Big Brother Knows best. Apparently unaware that The Conservation Movement was started by conservatives. And there is nothing wrong with wanting to conserve stuff. In comparison User:Rationalzombie94 Has stated that he reasonably opposes Trump on issues he is wrong about such as the wall and tax cuts. He also recognizes that it was not the Confederate Flag is a bad thing that causes death. It's just a Flag.
Also She is a hypocrite. She honestly believes the Russia gate conspiracy. Which has about much weight as the infamous Pizzagate conspiracy propagated by none other than 4-chan. Her hypocrasy goes further slandering me as having multiple sock accounts when I only have access to my newly bought laptop. But of course all her critics must be sock accounts
So In conclusion do you want someone Like User:LeftyGreenMario representing you? As a Rational person can you accept a biased woman who literally believes half the political spectrum has no merit? How can she with this bias claim to be a good "Moderate"tor? So I humbly give my endorsement of

User:Rationalzombie94 or anyone but her. This is my opinion so I don't mind if you guys disagree.

Who is the author of this incredibly biased article? An employee of the CDC perhaps?

[LeftyGreenMario: I am. Man, I'd love to have a professional job. Also, apparently, pointing out that using case study data to construct a cohort study is a truly atrocious mistake by anti-vaccine researchers is "bias".]


The Mario Bros debate on abortion

Mario Bros Views On Abortion.jpg

Sad people who dislike transgender people, good grammar, good parodies, and RationalWiki

TERF (category pissed at us plz).png

Signature

--It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod)