There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Merge with pH?
We shouldn't even have a stand-alone article on pH (just our pH woo article) as we're not an encyclopedia. That being said, a pH woo article is a great, missional concept. Thoughts? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- While I can see merit in merging said articles, Rev., there is nothing wrong per se in having an article on pH, just as we have articles on astronomy, the Sun, or vitamins. ScepticWombat (talk) 16:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
RichardR (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (CET) OK, some questions here, as I have no idea how to handle getting into contact with other RW people or how to deal with these 'talk' pages in particular (I bluntly copied the formatting of the above entries, but no doubt that isn't what I'm supposed to do). I edited the 'pH woo' page, and wondered if my contribution is enough to remove the "This article is a stub" message. I'd like to discuss these (and other) matters, but I couldn't locate a manual or tutorial for these 'talk' pages, so I hope someone reads this.