RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3630Goal: $5000


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Do we really need this "article"? Do people ever actually use this acronym? ħumanUser talk:Human 16:33, 17 March 2009 (EDT)

If not, I propose that we put it in the fun space. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 16:46, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
Well, I use it, and I picked up from a friend. But if someone wants to move it, go right ahead. And tell me how to put something in the Fun namespace while you're at it, please. MDB 16:55, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
You should be Careful about what you can Pick up from Friends. How would you Pronounce it? (I vote for Fun though.)--Tolerance 17:06, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
I pronounce it like this: "pie-doo-maa". MDB 19:45, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
To move a page into the Fun namespace, you give it a name beginning with "Fun:". Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 17:08, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
And followed by a colon. So to Create this Article you would put Fun:PIDOOMA in the Search box and take it from there.--Tolerance 17:19, 17 March 2009 (EDT)


Peanuts used it in 1953; it's even a bit chivalrous. Dunno if this needs an image or not, just throwing it out there. Random surfer (talk) 23:32, 18 December 2010 (UTC)