There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staffâwe are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Potentization
The spanking image seems in poor taste[edit]
I don't feel the snark there. I feel very slightly creeped out. ikanreed đBleat at me 15:18, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
'Logically'[edit]
Most surface/accessible water (ie not glacier internal meltwater, water from the deep oceans and deep caves etc) will have been in homeopathic or actual chemical processing contact with 'the homeopathic substances', and will have been shaken, stirred, alembic-ed and otherwise brought into intimate contact with said substances, so will be pre-potentization-ed and be the homeopathic equivalent of the philosopher's stone already.
Or am I missing something? Anna Livia (talk) 19:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)