Talk:Raphael Verelst

A noted atheist? My what a great addtion to our 'umble wiki. I hope he doesn't sue us. C®ackeЯ 02:33, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Is this a vanity page? I can't find anything on this guy other than his own social media stuff. VOX^HUMANA 03:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I got nothing. Тy^{Ask me about frog-backed securities} 03:5:0, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Probably is, (Especially given other readily accessible info) but I'm wary of nuking it out of a desire not to frustrate enthusiastic new contributors. — Unsigned, by ORavenhurst / talk^{Do You Believe That?} 03:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Meh, leave it for a few days, see if we get any traffic from it...maybe track page hits?...then nuke it if it doesn't get, oh, say 200 views. C®ackeЯ 03:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I favour nuking it to frustrate the new commer, that way they will know what they are in for editing here. Tmtoulouse, and nobody else 04:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah. Nobody else (talk) 04:07, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Dudes, the thing is, he goes on blogs actively but gets his posts deleted. What's funny is he got banned fomr pretty much every forum just because of his douchebaggery, which is why I noted all-around douchebag in his desc --AgnosticoRationale--

So? The net is full of trolls, nobody cares. He said so above. Tmtoulouse, and nobody else 04:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Methinks he's about to get blocked here too, soon. C®ackeЯ 04:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

According to the link on the page, Verelst's age is "14-17". Do you think we should have a page on a minor on here? --Psygremlin (talk) 09:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

No. Deleted.--ZooGuard (talk) 10:33, 1 August 2012 (UTC)