There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Red herring
Complete shit. Try again. AceMcWicked 19:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Schlafly's herring[edit]
...is actually an Argument from adverse consequences. The Fallacy Files classifies it as a type of red herring, though.--ZooGuard (talk) 12:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Foxhunting[edit]
Surely the red herring is part of the sport of #disrupting# fox hunting (allowing the fox to escape)? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)