There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Saturn
Science?[edit]
This is the only planet article with the science template and the only one listed under category:science. I'm curious if it is the opinion of the mob that it be removed, or rather if the other planet articles should receive the same treatment. PACODOGwoof, bitches 00:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- The template adds the category automatically. I'll remove it - it's supposed to be for articles about science/the science process, not about the subjects of science.--ZooGuard (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
We need to add the Saturn cube conspiracy to this page.[edit]
It's a big one right now. http://www.nicholson1968.com/nicholson1968s-post/saturn-worshipthe-black-cube
- Obvious fractal wrongness number one 'Pluto never was considered a planet.' FW No 2 - the significance of the rings (wedding and Saturn's - which have only been known about for 300ish years. (Do they mention 'Saturn Nine spaceship' and 'saturnine; as being significant rather than wordplay/pareidolia among the galloping brainwarp?) Anna Livia (talk) 22:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)