There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
List of publications
- And, loving the sound of my own voice too much, I put it on Wikipedia as well, in the proper desaturated form. It did come from another Wikipedia in the first place. So much for our chances with a certain search engine beginning with G - David Gerard (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Sane vs. Not so sane. I want to add a "why" tag to every single one. Why is each one sane or not so? Deletion looming, or refactoring, if clarity is not forthcoming soon... ħuman 09:01, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Um, dude. Read the damn titles. The 1970s-1980s stuff is when he was lucid, the 1990s stuff is his gibbering crank period. I really don't think it's too much to expect you to read the article if you're going to critique it ... - David Gerard (talk) 11:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Deletion debate on Wikipedia
 - please feel free to offer a considered opinion per Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I of course offer no suggestion as to what I think you should put there, if anything - David Gerard (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)