Talk:The Bible Code

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon christianity.svg

This Bible woo related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

Silly question[edit]

Silly question, but does anyone know where to get an ELS program from? I was wondering if some Conservapedia (or even RW or WP) articles were long enough to search through and have a reasonable chance of getting a positive. Scarlet A.pngbomination 09:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Reverse engineering the code[edit]

  • Apply program.
  • Get phrase
  • Take words in which said letters are found.
  • This message is significant.
  • If not, repeat until bored/something relevant surfaces/your significant other divorces you or tells you to do your chores.

Alternatively take pre-prepared phrase and proceed as from point 2. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 15:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Hidden word[edit]

As 'Bible' normally has an initial capital where is the initial 'B' of the codeword in the text?

The 'code' could only have been created #once the texts were actually written down# rather than recited from memory down the generations - and it is 'slightly fiddly' to make the 'visible text' read coherently around all the codes inserted. And the question is #why be so convoluted#? (What was the acrostic-sentences newspaper leader?) 82.44.143.26 (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Would probably be this if anyone is interested (but there may well be more). Anna Livia (talk) 10:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

The Greeks had a word for it[edit]

Scytale [1]. 82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Woo squared[edit]

From an 'only through Christ will you be saved/by their words rather than their deeds shall God decide)' type - there are many Bible Code predictions but some of them have been thwarted/avoided. Anna Livia (talk) 11:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

What happens[edit]

… if the Bible Code 'system' is applied to the Voynich Manuscript? Anna Livia (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Well the manuscript isn't written in a language we have deciphered, it will become even more gibberish. so nothing. 149.19.54.56 (talk) 16:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Bumpf
That was partly the point (in both directions). Anna Livia (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

KJV?[edit]

Surely this particular brand of bollocks can be applied to the KJV which, as any fule kno, is written in English Just Like Jesus Spoke? Mr Larrington (talk) 18:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)